Comment tracker status

From Data on the Web Best Practices
Jump to: navigation, search
Comment Status Editor's comment
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150625/3061 Resolved_yes I am not sure if we should mention the specification mentioned by Eric because it is still in a draft stage. If we're gonna mention, then the editors will need some help to write the text. Last year a message was sent to Christophe asking help about this comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jul/0055.html (in the current version this comment concerns BP 29).
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150625/3059 Resolved_yes We had long discussions by email about this subject: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-comments/2015Jul/0002.html and https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-comments/2015Oct/0000.html. Annette's email: Partially addressed. We don’t talk about fragment identifiers. I suggest we add it. This relates to LC-3058 and LC-3051. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2016Mar/0013.html.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150625/3057 Resolved_yes Proposed resolution: This comment was also discussed by email: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-comments/2015Jul/0002.html. A BP was created for this: https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#Conneg. Annette's email: Not addressed. We mention URIs and conneg in the API versioning BP, but not in the discussion of multiple formats. I suggest we add it https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2016Mar/0013.html.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150625/3058 Resolved_yes Annette's email: Not addressed. Actually that BP doesn’t address the issue raised. And that BP confuses fragment identifiers with reused URIs to refer to entities https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2016Mar/0013.html.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150625/3060 Resolved_yes Addressed: We now have a BP “Avoid breaking changes to your API”.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150625/3063 Resolved_yes BP about API and REST are still under review.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150625/3062 Resolved_yes Proposed resolution: To update the text on the DWBP document to replace public-dwbp-wg@w3.orhttps://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3034g by public-dwbp-comments@w3.org.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3051 Resolved_yes Proposed resolution: Best Practice 18 Vocabulary versioning was removed from the document. The current version of the document doesn't deal with vocabulary versioning.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3034 Resolved_yes See message: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jun/0084.html
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3035 Resolved_yes Christophe should review the new section about Data Vocabularies (https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#dataVocabularies)
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3054 Resolved_yes (it was duplicated) Duplicated to https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150625/3059
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3056 Resolved_yes (it was duplicated) Duplicated to https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150625/3061
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3052 Resolved_yes Addressed: We now have a BP “Avoid breaking changes to your API”.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3007 Resolved_yes See resolution on comment tracker.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3048 Resolved_yes Ask Annette's feedback.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3036 Resolved_yes See: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jun/0084.html
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3037 Resolved_yes Duplicated to https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3036
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3038 Resolved_yes See: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jun/0084.html. This comment should be discussed with Eric Stephan.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3039 Resolved_yes To update the document to be more generic about the different types of metadata. Christophe said: "It should also be ok saying there are several type of metadata without going into much details."
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3008 Resolved_yes To keep memento references just in the data versioning section.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3055 Resolved_yes (it was duplicated) Duplicated to https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150625/3060
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3040 Resolved_yes See: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jun/0084.html. This comment should be discussed with DQV editors.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3006 Resolved_yes Resolution: See http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-04-13#resolution_15
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3003 Resolved_yes Resolutionat f2f 2015-04-13. See also: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jun/0081.html
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3004 Resolved_yes Resolution at At f2f 2015-04-13. See also: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jun/0081.html
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3005 Resolved_yes See also: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jun/0081.html
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3028 Resolved_yes See also: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jun/0089.html
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3029 Resolved_yes See also: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jun/0089.html
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3030 Resolved_yes See also: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jun/0089.html. This comment should be discussed with the DQV editors.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3046 Resolved_yes Ask Annette's feedback.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3046 Resolved_yes See also: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jun/0089.html
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3049 Resolved_yes (it was duplicated) Duplicated to https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3046
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3053 Resolved_yes (it was duplicated) Duplicated to https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150625/3057
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3032 Resolved_yes See also: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jun/0089.html
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3033 Resolved_yes See also: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jun/0089.html. This comment should be discussed with the DQV editors.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3047 Resolved_yes Ask Annette's feedback.
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3050 Resolved_yes (it was duplicated) Duplicated with https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3047