ISSUE-48: Phil to look at whether the ucr doc sufficiently covers code lists
Phil to look at whether the ucr doc sufficiently covers code lists
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Data Usage Vocabulary
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2014-10-30
- Description:
- currently the ucr doesn't include code lists....does the use cases include code lists? This is an issue -per F2F
-JeniT's comment about separating the "vocabulary data model" requirement from the "vocabulary code list" requirement - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RE: Code lists in the UCR (from Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu on 2015-03-27)
- Re: Code lists in the UCR (from ig.ibert@gmail.com on 2015-03-26)
- Re: Code lists in the UCR (from adrianoc@dcc.ufmg.br on 2015-03-26)
- Re: Code lists in the UCR (from bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl on 2015-03-26)
- Re: Code lists in the UCR (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2015-03-26)
- Re: Code lists in the UCR (from laufer@globo.com on 2015-03-26)
- Re: Code lists in the UCR (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2015-03-26)
- Re: Code lists in the UCR (from yaso@nic.br on 2015-03-26)
- Code lists in the UCR (from phila@w3.org on 2015-03-26)
- Re: Minor updates to UCR (from phila@w3.org on 2015-01-22)
- Code lists Issue-48 (from phila@w3.org on 2015-01-22)
- ISSUE-48: Phil to look at whether the ucr doc sufficiently covers code lists (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-10-30)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log