ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies?

Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Best practices document(s)

Raised by:

Bernadette Farias Loscio

Opened on:

2015-11-10

Description:

I propose to change the Why section to be more specific about the use of shared vocabularies. My proposal is below:
"Shared vocabularies, i.e., vocabularies that capture a consensus
of the community about a specific domain, helps to increase
interoperability between datasets, encouraging reuse of the data.
Shared vocabularies should be used to describe both structural
metadata as well as other types of metadata (descriptive,
provenance, quality and versioning). The use of shared
vocabularies to describe metadata helps the automatic processing
of data and metadata."

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (from amgreiner@lbl.gov on 2016-03-14)
2. Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2016-03-14)
3. Re: Open Issues to be closed during the F2F Zagreb (from amgreiner@lbl.gov on 2016-03-14)
4. Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2016-03-13)
5. Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (from amgreiner@lbl.gov on 2016-03-13)
6. Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2016-03-13)
7. Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2016-03-12)
8. Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (from amgreiner@lbl.gov on 2016-03-11)
9. Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2016-03-11)
10. Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2016-03-11)
11. Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2016-03-03)
12. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2015-11-27)
13. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2015-11-26)
14. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2015-11-20)
15. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2015-11-20)
16. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2015-11-17)
17. Re: Changing BPs in data vocabulary section (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2015-11-12)
18. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2015-11-12)
19. Re: Changing BPs in data vocabulary section (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2015-11-10)
20. dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-11-10)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log