ISSUE-159: Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept?
Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Data Usage Vocabulary
- Raised by:
- Eric Stephan
- Opened on:
- 2015-04-12
- Description:
- The Data Usage Vocabulary can rely on the Data Quality and Granularity vocabulary to describe types of feedback, in the form of metrics etc. Data Quality descriptions can exist as an assessment independently of Data Usage. E.g. a data producer provides assessments to the data producer at the time of publication.
Question: Is it more natural fit for the R-QualityOpinions requirements to be a part of the Data Usage Vocabulary IF R-QualityOpinions is only to be used to describe consumer feedback?
If R-QualityOpinions is viewed as the other Data Quality vocabulary requirements where opinions could be provided in some cases independent of Data Usage feedback, then perhaps R-QualityOpinions should stay a part of the Data Quality Vocabulary.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from ericphb@gmail.com on 2015-04-12)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2015-04-12)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2015-04-12)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from ericphb@gmail.com on 2015-04-12)
- dwbp-ISSUE-159 (Eric Stephan): Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept? [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-04-12)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
