See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 16 December 2013
<jyates> what is the passcode?
<hhalpin> So, people are not having trouble dialing in using the normal code
<hhalpin> however, is anyone on IRC dialing in and having trouble dialing in?
<virginie> yeap, i do
<mountie> I had trouble shortly
<hhalpin> Can you explain what your trouble is precisely?
<hhalpin> Dialing in *before* the telcon will mean the code wont' work :)
<hhalpin> There does seem to be some problems with Zakim, he's not associating the phone properly to the telco
<virginie> which passcode did u use ?
<hhalpin> The same one as normal
<hhalpin> CRYPT
what is the conf code?
<hhalpin> CRYPT
<hhalpin> What happens when you try it?
conf code invalid
<jyates> 27978#
that is what I entered. Will try again
Got in after the 3rd try
<jyates> aabb is jyates
virginie: agenda: timeline and
future work
... may not have technical topic
harry: can you repeat?
... we discussed hosting workshop
... we may need to bring more people on
Virginie: still not have a fixed date from Ryan
<hhalpin> markw - have you had any issues with working on the spec?
Virginie: there is an update of the spec, Dec. 10th
<virginie> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html
Virginie: hope to have something after Jan
Harry: we can wait for one more
week, otherwise add another editor
... W3C prefer to have at least 2 co-editors
Mark: the only difficult is to get Ryan to say go ahead
Mark - it is difficult to hear you
<hhalpin> Ideally, we would want Ryan on the phone, but we can propose over the mailing list first
<hhalpin> to make sure Ryan is fine with having a co-editor.
Virginie: action - clarify editor status with Mark and Ryan
<markw> (for minutes) I am happy to be co-editor
<hhalpin> Next version we can push off till end of Jan at earliest really
<hhalpin> But given amount of work, it may take till February at least
<hhalpin> I'd like "all hands on deck" to push bugfixes to spec out after Christmas vacation
Virginie: expect to have a spec by Jan 13th
Mark: we can publish with mention of remaining bugs
<hhalpin> There was *lots* of clarifying text!
Virginie: it seems to take too long to clarify bugs
Mark: it is useful to draw up a
list, editorial and technical
... it'll be difficult to draw a date for the technical
ones
<hhalpin> The issue with Bugzilla and editorial/technical ones seem mixed up - happy to move technical ones back to Issue Tracker if that helps
Virginal: priority list on the call?
Mark: good
<virginie> +1
<israelh> -1
<hhalpin> Some groups meet during winter break, others don't.
<nvdbleek> -1
<hhalpin> It's up to group
<mountie> +1
<markw> -1
+1
<markw> I have a conflict that day
a poll to maintain a call on Dec 30th
Virginie: try to see if Ryan can
be there.
... if he cannot make it either, we will cancel
... next one will keep
<hhalpin> Wait a sec, the next meeting is Jan 13th, right?
Virginie: any concern?
<hhalpin> The poll was over Dec 30th, Karen.
mountie?
<virginie> http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/track/actions/64
<virginie> action related to integration of SEED
<trackbot> Error finding 'related'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/track/users>.
<hhalpin> One idea is we should maintain a wiki of requested algorithms
<hhalpin> Melvin also wanted some ECC curves
Virginie: Mountie - do you have suggestions?
mountie: we are preparing some text
Virginie: that's good. best to
proceed is to preparing text
... should we maintain a wiki for requested algorithm?
... while people are pushing algorithms
... we will create a wiki page to track requested crypto
algo
<hhalpin> My logic is that while yet another wiki page might not be so fun, we're having a few recommendations for algorithms that aren't uniformly implemented in browsers
harry: Ryan pushed back on algos that are not implemented in browsers.
<hhalpin> ACTION virginie and hhalpin to create a wiki-page for suggested algorithms from mailing lists
<trackbot> Created ACTION-134 - And hhalpin to create a wiki-page for suggested algorithms from mailing lists [on Virginie GALINDO - due 2013-12-23].
virginie: now discuss future work
<hhalpin> (btw, I think ryan pushing back is reasonable!)
<hhalpin> (but we should not lose track of requests for algorithms)
virginie: let's look at where we are on future work
<virginie> Future work wiki : http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/wiki/WG_Future_Work
virginie: potential - web payment
activity
... no leader for hardware token
... how do you want to be involved in this future work?
suggestions?
israel: we are interested in
streams.
... in re-org now. by mid Jan, will know
virginie: are couple of people are interested in hardware tokens. Nick would you be interested in?
Nick: cannot commit at this time. may be January
harry: suggestion - if we have interest but have trouble to have people to lead (stream), may be have a workshop in June
<hhalpin> http://www.w3.org/2011/identity-ws/
<hhalpin> in 2011
<hhalpin> workshop
<hhalpin> Does group want to do a workshop to get more energy?
harry: the group must say we are interested in
<hhalpin> Generally, there's about 6 months between a workshop and future work :)
<hhalpin> We would not need a workshop just to add streams
<hhalpin> but we would as regards anything around hardware tokens
israel: the issue seems to be
competitive proposals on streams
... webapp needs to have a uniformed proposal
... confusion in webapps' proposal prevents this moving
forward
harry: will be happy to push
webapps WG
... clarify: workshop on hardware token
<hhalpin> ACTION: hhalpin to press on W3C Team re unified Streams proposal [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/12/16-crypto-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-135 - Press on w3c team re unified streams proposal [on Harry Halpin - due 2013-12-23].
Virginie: propose the scope on
the workshop - hardware token, storage?
... write down different topics, submit to the workshop
... Harry can discuss with W3C
Harry: great
Virginie: I will write the scope
with Harry and share with the group in Jan
... will reformulate the wiki by priority
... certificate mgmt will be a higher priority
... anything else?
... we will keep this call time at least for the next two
virginie: spec needs your support. if you have suggestions for resolving bugs, that'll be great
<hhalpin> thanks everyone!
<hhalpin> Next call Dec 30th unless cancelled
virginie: thanks! talked to you Dec 13th
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/a call on Jan 13th/a call on Dec 30th/ Succeeded: s/Next call Jan 13th/Next call Dec 30th unless cancelled/ No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: karen_ Inferring Scribes: karen_ Default Present: markw, +1.617.253.aaaa, +1.617.253.aabb, [Microsoft], virginie, +1.323.425.aacc, Karen, nvdbleek, hhalpin, mountie Present: markw +1.617.253.aaaa +1.617.253.aabb [Microsoft] virginie +1.323.425.aacc Karen nvdbleek hhalpin mountie WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 16 Dec 2013 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/12/16-crypto-minutes.html People with action items: hhalpin[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]