See also: IRC log
<scribe> Scribe: Jan
JS: reviewing exit
criteria...
... Any questions, thoughts, concerns?
JT: We should clarify that what
we are proposing is that we are passing them by W3M...
... So they can register and objections.
JS: My only concern is the 2nd
sentence in para 3...
... It can be hard to explain the ATAG-WCAG relationship...3
levels each...but is unrealisitic to expect tools to meet every
WCAG AAA SC
... We chose the number two because it is common in W3C
requirements
JT: Any concerns about this
proposed wording?
... And are people ok sending it to w3m
JR: +1
AC: IF my looking at an individual tool....
JS: Are we will try to choose diverse examples
<jeanne> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ATAG2ImplementationReport.html
<AlastairC> There don't seem to be any Non-text media examples in the top row of the implementing tools?
JS: We have a couple of ideas
TB: I checked on Worklight and it won't work for us
<AlastairC> Would xcode qualify for this? Code-level editor, but I think is accessible?
TB: We are making progress on the other one
<AlastairC> I have it installed, I'll check it out. I can ask on a VoiceOver list as well.
JT: So we should repeat to Cherie....
Zaki, Jan has Jutta
JT: Can people indicate when they
have read the document...
... then hopefully we can come to resolution on what to do.
EC: I've scanned through it
JT: Are people ok with this draft as it is?
<AlastairC> The exit criterial? Yep, it's good.
JT: Are people ok with this draft exit criteria as it is?
<AlastairC> \me sorry, don't trust my audio, I'll type.
JT: Does anyone object to the
exit crieria?
... None heard
... Can we send to W3M?
JS: +1
<AlastairC> +1
JS: Also it is pretty informal
JR: +1 to send it along
JT: OK I think there is concensus to take that step and send it to W3M
<jeanne> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/draft_auwg_charter.html
JS: Some feedback received from
W3M...
... Did show enough diversity of devices...
... Had to change the milestones from saying CR in May to CR in
Septemebr
<AlastairC> Yep, I assume that a year is a reasonable time for comments and changes from CR?
TB: Looks good to me
... but how does it compare to other guidelines?
<AlastairC> no objection
JT: OK so are people fine with these changes to the charter (added mention of various devices and then changes to dates)?
<jeanne> +1 to the charter
JT: Objections?
... non eheard
Resolution: Go ahead with changes to the charter (added mention of various devices and then changes to dates)
JR: Medium sized tools make excellent examples
JS: Right, but enterprise tools
are very valuable so please keep pushing for that
... I don't want to overlook enterprise wide tools
CE: OK, but the point has been made that enterprise tools out now won't be fully meeting ATAG
JT: Yes, we want variety
<AlastairC> an accessibility orgnanisation I'm involved with is using an enterprise level CRM, I offered to check it over for them in the fall (when they have it implementated)
JT: Great!
... That's the agenda
... There will be a meeting next week
<AlastairC> thanks all, bye
JR: I will send out announcement but may not be there due to CDN holiday
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: Jan Inferring ScribeNick: Jan Default Present: Jeanne, Tom, Alastair, Jutta, Cherie Present: Jeanne Tom Alastair Jutta Cherie Regrets: Tim_B. Alex_L. Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013JulSep/0014.html Got date from IRC log name: 29 Jul 2013 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/07/29-au-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]