agenda review and discussion of ITS IG charter and ITS 2.0 / ITS IG promotion

<fsasaki> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its-ig/2013Jul/0004.html

<fsasaki> discussing ITS IG charter revision and interest group promotion

chriLi: Asks whether the IG can move things or not

<dF> will join audio within 15min or so..

<fsasaki> ok

<fsasaki> IG homepage http://w3.org/International/its/ig/

<fsasaki> IG charter http://www.w3.org/International/its/ig/ITSIGCharter.html

chriLi: Asks whether the guidelines for the IG are same than the WG

fsasaki: W3C management agrees with a new charter but it will take time
... The IG promotion is a good idea

chriLi: we definetey need to have a good situation for implementors
... we have the IG to help

fsasaki: I have a pending action to create push the creation of material such as videos...

chriLi: last comment wrt the charter, thinks that would be helpful for people to know more about the scope and work items, even if the charter update takes time

<fsasaki> ACTION: felix to add a "work items" link to the IG homepage [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-i18nits-minutes.html#action01]

Actions needed for ITS 2.0

fsasaki: nothing needed at the moment

presentation from Jörg Schultz about interoperability now and its relation to ITS 2.0

@joerg: starts the presentation

@joerg: Interoperability now was created in 2010 out of neccessity

<fsasaki> [question about relation of tasks to ITS 2.0 provenance?]

<dF> sorry I missed most of Jörgs presentation, will the recording be available?

<fsasaki> hi dF, yes, I am recording the gotomeeting

@joerg: Ends the presentation

pnietoca: Q/A

<daveL> .. still recording

<Pedro> Thank you Felix.

<fsasaki> np

@joerg: Answers Dave's question

daveL: Would be good to have a BP on TIPP

@joerg: Depends on if you're working in a cloud or on a more private cloud

daveL: asks whether they can share with the community

@joerg: yes

<fsasaki> yves: xliff:doc is syntactically xliff 1.2, but semantically it is different

<fsasaki> .. e.g. notation for segemtnation is not 1.2 segmentation marker

<fsasaki> .. the xliff 1.2 issue it is not resolved although interop now is aware of that

<fsasaki> joerg: or we might move over to xliff 2.0

fsasaki: any other questions?

chriLi: what's the direction regarding ITS 2.0?

@joerg: not sure for the moment

<omstefanov> fsasaki: I see in the minutes that you have been recording the session. Like dF I had other conf call. I'd appreciate a way to see/listen to the presentation and discussion.

items not covered today

fsasaki: Arle would not be joining today
... so no mqm discussion this week, come back to it next week

daveL: ITS ontology can be postponed to next week

fsasaki: Gather issues wrt XLIFF Mapping

<fsasaki> ACTION: Yves to try to present open issues for xliff mapping, focusing on xliff 1.2 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/07/03-i18nits-minutes.html#action02]

Yves_: I can present something next week

<Yves_> ITS mapping to XLIFF 1.2: http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/XLIFF_1.2_Mapping

fsasaki: Next week we will focus on the XLIFF Mapping

@joerg: Will be covered the dicussion about MQM next week?

<fsasaki> next week - xliff mapping and mqm as topics

chriLi: We need to stay focus on the IG in ITS 2.0

daveL: Agrees

dF: Wrt Feistgilt I asked everybody to upload presentations and other material