Meetings:Telecon2013.02.20

Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes

  17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London)
Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200
  SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org
 Zakim code: 73394
IRC channel: #rdf-wg on irc.w3.org on port 6665
Zakim instructions:  http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Scribes

Admin

• Chair: David Wood
• Scribe: <to be assigned>
• Alternate: <to be assigned>

Minutes of last meeting

PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 13 February telecon:

   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2013-02-13

Review of action items

• http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/pendingreview
• http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/open

Extension request

See: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Rdf-extension.html

Turtle

Congratulations to all!

Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language specification is now a W3C Candidate Recommendation:

 http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/

Semantics

Editor's draft:

 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/index.html

• Should we allow blank nodes to be used as graph names? That is, allow a graph name to be both (IRI, graph), and (blank node, graph).

NB: JSON-LD has a preference to allow blank nodes as graph names.

From Manu: PROPOSAL: Allow blank nodes to be used as graph names. Specifically, allow associating (IRI, graph) and (blank node, graph) when naming graphs.

• Do blank node identifiers, when used as graph names, denote graphs?

From Manu: PREFERENCE POLL: Blank nodes, when used as graph names, denote the graph that they are paired with.

• ISSUE-109: What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed?

Review of WG status

Open issues:

  https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/products

AOB