Meetings:Telecon2012.09.19

Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes
  17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London)
Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200
  SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org
 Zakim code: 73394
IRC channel: #rdf-wg on irc.w3.org on port 6665
Zakim instructions:  http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Scribes

Admin

• Chair: David Wood
• Scribe: Dan Brickley
• Alternate: Eric Prud'hommeaux

Minutes of last meeting

PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 12 September:

   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-09-12

Review of action items

• http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/pendingreview
• http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/open

Next meeting

• Next telecon: 26 September 2012

Next FTF

Mon-Tue 29-30 Oct, Lyon, France, co-located with TPAC.

Info and registration information:

 http://www.w3.org/2012/10/TPAC/

See also Sandro's recommendation for attending other meetings during TPAC:

 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Jul/0039.html

REMINDER: Please remember to register your intent on the F2F3 and, if attending in person, register and pay for TPAC.

Provenance Constraints Review

Questions for the RDF WG:

- Does the terminology, Bundle and Document work with the terminology in the RDF WG?

- With respect to Bundle and Document do the defined constraints work with what is potentially being specified in RDF?

http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2012/09/12/last-call-constraints-of-the-provenance-data-model/

Volunteers to review?

Turtle

The LC period has ended on 15 Sep.

Question: Where are comments and responses being tracked?

Proposals from editors.

JSON-LD

Request for document review by WG members.

Graphs

Dataset semantics

Minimal semantics proposal from Antoine:

 http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs/Minimal-dataset-semantics

See associated thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Sep/0008.html

PROPOSED: Editors should integrate the "Minimal Semantics" design and included test cases into Working Drafts and the Test Suite, with the understanding that this is the approach we will use unless serious problems emerge. Any specific issues people have with this design should be RAISE'd soon.

Please note that the above proposal infers agreement with the Design Decisions at http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs/Minimal-dataset-semantics#Design_Decisions_.28DDs.29

AOB