Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
Meetings:Telecon2011.12.21
From RDF Working Group Wiki
Contents
Agenda RDF-WG telecon 21 Dec 2011
Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes 17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London) Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200 SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org UK: +44.203.318.0479 FR: +33.4.26.46.79.03 Zakim code: 73394 IRC channel: #rdf-wg on irc.w3.org on port 6665 Zakim instructions: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Scribes
Admin
- Chair: David Wood
- Scribe: Andy Seaborne
Alternate: Manu Sporny
PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 14 Dec telecon:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-12-14
Action item review:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/pendingreview http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/open
Next telecon: 4 Jan 2012
Named Graphs
Graph-State Resources
See thread starting with http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Dec/0033.html
Issue: should/must the 4th slot be an IRI?
See thread starting with http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Nov/0116.html
Two alternative points of view (see minutes 30 Nov):
- we are not in a position to constrain the type of the "4th slot"
- we are standardizing graph identifiers, so they better be identifiers (= IRI)
Todo: list arguments in favor/against these positions (e.g. #1 breaks TriG).
Meta-discussion: routes for reaching consensus
- 4th slot should be an IRI?!
- no semantics for relationship between the Graph IRI and the graph?!
- can we do more?