Agenda RDF-WG telecon 20 July 2011

Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes
  17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London)
Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200
  SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org
  UK: +44.203.318.0479
  FR: +33.4.26.46.79.03
Zakim code: 73394
IRC channel: #rdf-wg on irc.w3.org on port 6665
Zakim instructions:  http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Scribes

Admin

• Chair: David Wood
• Scribe: Nathan Rixham
• Alternate: Pierre-Antoine Champin

PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 20 July telecon:

   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-07-20

Action item review:

   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/pendingreview
   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/open

Next telecon: 17 August

NB: Turtle has been officially moved to First Public Working Draft.

FTF2 Admin

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/F2F2

RDF Concepts Editors Draft

Ready for first public working draft?

 http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html

See also: Introduction of RDF/XML spec doesn't explain relationship to RDF Concepts

 http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/72

Graph terminology

Threads on graph terminology:

 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Jul/0014.html
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Jul/0093.html

• g-snap: "RDF graph"
• g-box: "RDF graph resource"?
• g-text: <no name>? "RDF graph serialization/representation"?

Relevant issues:

ISSUE-14 What is a named graph and what should we call it?

ISSUE-38 graph-vocabulary: What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs?

ISSUE-29 default-graph: Do we support SPARQL's notion of "default graph"?

ISSUE-30 sparql datasets: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?

ISSUE-12 language-tagged literals

See proposal plus thread:

 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Jul/0048.html

SPARQL coordination

SPARQL Last Call: see message from Lee: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011May/0192.html

Review of Pierre-Antoine: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Jun/0154.html

AOB