ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)

Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Cleanup tasks
Raised by:
Opened on:
2011-10-13
Description:
<sandro> RESOLVED: Close issue-77 marking SEQ as Archaic (saying folks shouldn't use it for new vocabs)

at F2F3
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-10-21)
  2. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-21)
  3. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-10-21)
  4. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-10-21)
  5. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-20)
  6. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr on 2011-10-20)
  7. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-10-20)
  8. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-20)
  9. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-20)
  10. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2011-10-20)
  11. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2011-10-20)
  12. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-20)
  13. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-20)
  14. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-10-20)
  15. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2011-10-20)
  16. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-20)
  17. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2011-10-20)
  18. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-20)
  19. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-20)
  20. Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-10-20)
  21. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from danbri2011@danbri.org on 2011-10-19)
  22. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from danbri2011@danbri.org on 2011-10-19)
  23. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2011-10-19)
  24. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2011-10-19)
  25. proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-19)
  26. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-19)
  27. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-10-19)
  28. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-10-19)
  29. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2011-10-19)
  30. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2011-10-19)
  31. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2011-10-19)
  32. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from pierre-antoine@champin.net on 2011-10-19)
  33. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-19)
  34. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-19)
  35. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from alexhall@revelytix.com on 2011-10-19)
  36. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2011-10-19)
  37. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-19)
  38. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-10-19)
  39. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2011-10-19)
  40. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-10-19)
  41. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-10-19)
  42. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-19)
  43. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-10-19)
  44. Re: proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-10-19)
  45. proposal to close ISSUE-77 (Re: [ALL} agenda telecon Oct 19) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-18)
  46. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-10-17)
  47. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2011-10-17)
  48. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-17)
  49. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-10-17)
  50. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-17)
  51. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-17)
  52. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-10-17)
  53. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-17)
  54. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-16)
  55. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-16)
  56. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2011-10-16)
  57. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2011-10-16)
  58. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2011-10-16)
  59. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2011-10-16)
  60. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-16)
  61. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-16)
  62. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-16)
  63. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-10-16)
  64. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from id@talis.com on 2011-10-15)
  65. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from danbri2011@danbri.org on 2011-10-15)
  66. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from id@talis.com on 2011-10-15)
  67. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from id@talis.com on 2011-10-15)
  68. Re: 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from ian.davis@talis.com on 2011-10-15)
  69. 'Simple Lists' (was Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24)) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-15)
  70. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-15)
  71. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-10-15)
  72. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-10-15)
  73. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from jeremy@topquadrant.com on 2011-10-15)
  74. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-15)
  75. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2011-10-15)
  76. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-10-15)
  77. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2011-10-15)
  78. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-10-15)
  79. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-10-14)
  80. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-10-14)
  81. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2011-10-14)
  82. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-10-14)
  83. Re: ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-10-14)
  84. ISSUE-77: Should we mark rdf:Seq as archaic (cf ISSUE-24) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-10-13)

Related notes:

The big usage here is / was the RSS 1.0 spec. Can we get stats eg from sindice.com?

Dan Brickley, 13 Oct 2011, 17:14:00

RESOLVED: Hold the resolution at http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-10-29#resolution_2 in abeyance pending further study.

Based on Larry Masinter's comments on Day 2 of FTF3.

David Wood, 30 Oct 2012, 08:56:38

Display change log ATOM feed

Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, Chair, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 77.html,v 1.1 2014-07-09 12:18:03 carine Exp $