ISSUE-3: Between us, we need to study the feedback we got via http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/ on the previous round of specs (and errata)
Between us, we need to study the feedback we got via http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/ on the previous round of specs (and errata)
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Cleanup tasks
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2011-02-23
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-3: scan of rdf-comments (completes ACTION-102) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2012-10-30)
- ISSUE-3: Between us, we need to study the feedback we got via http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/ on the previous round of specs (and errata) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-02-23)
Related notes:
Turned into ACTION-102
Sandro Hawke, 13 Oct 2011, 17:39:38See http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Additional_Errata_and_Comments#RDF_Syntax
Guus Schreiber, 30 Jan 2013, 17:26:54Display change log
