ISSUE-38: What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs?
graph-vocabulary
What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDF Graphs
- Raised by:
- Antoine Zimmermann
- Opened on:
- 2011-04-15
- Description:
- If it is possible to assert statements about g-*, then we may need some additional vocabulary such as a class rdf:Graph and possibly relations between them such as graph imports, subgraph, equivalent graph, etc. and maybe a property that relates an instance of rdf:Graph to its content.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RDF-ISSUE-167 (stronger dataset semantics): Stronger semantics of RDF Datasets? [RDF Semantics] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-23)
- Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-14)
- Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-14)
- Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-10-14)
- Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-11)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-11)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-10-11)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-10)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-10-10)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-09)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-10-09)
- status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-09)
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-09)
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-09)
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-09)
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-08)
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-08)
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-08)
- RDF-ISSUE-151: LC comment: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 [RDF Concepts] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-08)
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-08)
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-08)
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-07)
- owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-07-11)
- Solve ISSUE-35 and ISSUE-38 by referring to SPARQL 1.1 Service description (from antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr on 2012-09-10)
- Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2012-01-12)
- Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-01-11)
- Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-01-11)
- Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-01-11)
- Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from david@3roundstones.com on 2012-01-11)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] (from antoine.zimmermann@gmail.com on 2011-04-16)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-04-16)
- RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-15)
Related notes:
Resolution at Oct 2012 F2F:
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-35 and ISSUE-38 saying we're not going to do these in a REC, but might something like this in a WG NOTE ←
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-10-29#resolution_10
Display change log