ISSUE-34: Do we need to add syntactic sugar to turtle, beyond what's in the Submission (such as inverse paths and =)?

turtle sugar

Do we need to add syntactic sugar to turtle, beyond what's in the Submission (such as inverse paths and =)?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

RDF Turtle

Raised by:

Steve Harris

Opened on:

2011-04-13

Description:

Closing without adding any features (syntactic sugar) to Turtle over what is in the submission

Closed in http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-04-27 however missed and closed ISSUE-12.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: naming dataset syntax (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-09-26)
2. Re: naming dataset syntax (from kidehen@openlinksw.com on 2012-09-26)
3. Re: naming dataset syntax (from david@3roundstones.com on 2012-09-26)
4. Re: naming dataset syntax (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2012-09-26)
5. Re: naming dataset syntax (from kidehen@openlinksw.com on 2012-09-26)
6. Re: naming dataset syntax (from david@3roundstones.com on 2012-09-26)
7. Re: naming dataset syntax (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2012-09-26)
8. naming dataset syntax (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-09-26)
9. Re: Dataset Syntax - checking for consensus (from david@3roundstones.com on 2012-09-26)
10. Re: [ALL] agenda 27 April telecon (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-04-28)
11. Re: [ALL] agenda 27 April telecon (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-04-27)
12. ISSUE-34: Do we need to add features to turtle, beyond what's in the Submission (such as inverse paths and =)? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-13)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log