ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers
QNames are too restrictive as identifiers
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- XML Serialization
- Raised by:
- Luc Moreau
- Opened on:
- 2012-09-13
- Description:
- The current schema uses xsd:QName for identifiers.
As a result, the following identifier is not allowed:
<prov:activity prov:id="pc1:00000p1">
<prov:label>align_warp 1</prov:label>
</prov:activity>
An xml schema validator would complain with:
'pc1:00000p1' is not a valid value for 'QName'
Solution: allow for prov:QualifiedName (as defined in prov-n).
Luc - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- PROV XML Identifiers - discussion and straw poll (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2013-02-04)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] (from hook.hua@jpl.nasa.gov on 2013-01-31)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2013-01-30)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-01-30)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2013-01-29)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-01-29)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2013-01-24)
- Fwd: XML schema for provenance (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-11-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-11-20)
- PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-09-13)
Related notes:
I am closing this issue based on the passing of the proposal to adopt QNames and PROV-XML identifiers, which was voted on during the 2013-02-07 group meeting.
http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2013-02-07#PROV__2d_XML
Display change log