ISSUE-239: is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful?
TLebo
is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- prov-dm
- Raised by:
- Timothy Lebo
- Opened on:
- 2012-02-06
- Description:
- Everything but entity is OPTIONAL in wasGeneratedBy.
If I say only wasGeneratedBy(e), what did I say? And why was I allowed to say it?
from WD3:
A generation record, written wasGeneratedBy(id,e,a,t,attrs) in PROV-ASN, has the following components:
id: an optional identifier id identifying the generation record;
entity: an identifier e identifying an entity record that represents the entity that is created;
activity: an optional identifier a identifying an activity record that represents the activity that creates the entity; - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-03)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-03)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-02-07)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-02-07)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2012-02-07)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2012-02-07)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-02-07)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-02-07)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2012-02-07)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-02-07)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-06)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-06)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-06)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2012-02-06)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2012-02-06)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2012-02-06)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-02-06)
- PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-02-06)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log