Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm]

Great. I closed the issue. Thanks.

>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/239

-Tim


On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:47 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> 
> 
> Hi Tim,
> In the latest draft [1], we stated:
> 
> While each of the components activity, time, and attributes is optional, at least one of them must be present.
> 
> I believe this addresses your concern.
> I propose to close the issue pending review.
> 
> Regards,
> Luc
> 
> [1]http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Generation
> 
> On 02/06/2012 09:19 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm]
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/239
>> 
>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>> On product: prov-dm
>> 
>> Everything but entity is OPTIONAL in wasGeneratedBy.
>> 
>> If I say only wasGeneratedBy(e), what did I say? And why was I allowed to say it?
>> 
>> from WD3:
>> 
>> 
>> A generation record, written wasGeneratedBy(id,e,a,t,attrs) in PROV-ASN, has the following components:
>> 
>>     id: an optional identifier id identifying the generation record;
>>     entity: an identifier e identifying an entity record that represents the entity that is created;
>>     activity: an optional identifier a identifying an activity record that represents the activity that creates the entity;
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   
> 
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
> 
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 13:54:32 UTC