Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
DCAT Comments
Comments and responses for the DCAT Candidate Recommendation
Comment | Summary | Status | GLD response | Acknowledgement |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.Luke Blaney |
downloadURL and accessURL(Issue-70) |
resolved | first-reply latest-proposal | |
2.Luke Blaney |
Domain is missing for some DCAT properties |
resolved | reply |
Comments and draft responses for the DCAT second Last Call ending 2013-08-30.
Comment | Summary | Status | GLD response | Acknowledgement |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Makx Dekkers |
clarify description of accessURL and downloadURL properties |
resolved | reply | acknowledged as resolved |
2. Leigh Dodds |
provide examples of the usage of all properties particularly those that might be underspecified such as dct:accrualPeriodicity, dct:spatial, dct:temporal |
resolved | reply | addressed though further edits suggested |
3. Antoine Isaac |
versioning |
resolved | first-reply latest-proposal | [1] |
4. Johan De Smedt |
describe dataset schema |
resolved | reply | |
5. Johan De Smedt |
dataset dependency |
resolved | reply | [2] |
Comments and draft responses for the DCAT Last Call ending 2013-04-08.
Comment | Summary | Status | GLD response | Acknowledgement |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Aaron Couch |
|
Resolved | reply | |
2. Jeni Tennison |
Use dct:rights instead of dct:license |
Tracked as ISSUE-60. Resolved |
||
3. Jeni Tennison |
Consider adding dct:provenance or prov:has_provenance |
resolved | reply | acknowledged as resolved |
4. Paul Groth |
|
resolved | reply | |
5. Stuart Harrison |
Can DCAT describe APIs? |
Tracked in ISSUE-62.
Resolved |
reply | |
6. Vasily Bunakov |
Add a dcat:interface property that points to a statement or manifest about technical means of accessing the dataset |
Tracked in ISSUE-62.
Resolved |
||
7. Marios Meimaris |
Add a property that links a distribution to an external concept that describes its access rules and methods |
Tracked in ISSUE-62.
Resolved |
||
8. Alasdair Gray |
|
Resolved | replied | |
9. Phil Archer |
Don't say that 2005-01-01 should be used for "unknown date in 2005" |
Tracked as ISSUE-63.
Resolved |
reply | |
10. Stasinos Konstantopolous |
Don't say that 2005-01-01 should be used for "unknown date in 2005" |
Tracked as ISSUE-63.
Resolved |
reply | |
11. Alasdair Gray |
|
Tracked as ISSUE-64.
Resolved |
no consensus - closed |
|
12. Bill Roberts |
|
We don't do granularity because it's hard. For accrualPeriodicity, can use SDMX COGs. Editor to add COG example to spec. | Resolved | |
13. Andrea Perego |
Add properties for dataset versioning, along the lines of ADMS |
Resolved | reply | |
14. Christopher Gutteridge |
Add Contact and Corrections properties |
Resolved | reply | |
15. Andrea Perego |
What exactly is the scope of DCAT? Datasets or any kind of resource? Consider extending the scope. |
Tracked in ISSUE-62. | ||
16. Ed Simons |
Issues
Suggestions
|
Editor can respond to most points; if not, will raise issues for WG discussion | reply | |
17. Makx Dekkers |
The mental model of catalogs + datasets, and whether they can be used independently, is not really clear |
Resolved - editors to paste links to relevant emails into this table | replies: 1 2 3 4 | |
18. Makx Dekkers |
Is it implied that a dcat:Dataset must have at least one distribution on the Web |
Resolved - editors to paste links to relevant emails into this table | replies: 1 2 3 4 | [3] |
19. Makx Dekkers |
What is the "single source" that the dcat:Dataset definition talks about? |
Editors to make changes to the draft (e.g. "Single source" will be changed to "single agent".) | implemented | |
20. Makx Dekkers |
Spec presents Concept and ConceptScheme in a single box despite being separate classes |
Editors to complete | implemented | |
21. Makx Dekkers |
Not clear what distinguishes a dataset from rdfs:Resource |
Resolved in F2F | resolved | |
22. Makx Dekkers |
Range of dct:language should be dct:LinguisticSystem |
Editor to make editorial change | implemented | |
23. Makx Dekkers |
DCAT should not place restrictions on use of SKOS |
Needs working group discussion |