ISSUE-58: Relate org:Organization to prov:Organization
prov:Organization
Relate org:Organization to prov:Organization
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Organization Ontology
- Raised by:
- Dave Reynolds
- Opened on:
- 2013-02-21
- Description:
- As raised by Eric in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0045.html PROV-O includes a prov:Organization.
Should ORG now declare and explicit relationship between org:Organization and prov:Organization?
Should that be owl:equivalentClass or just rdfs:subClassOf? - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-58 (prov:Organization): Relate org:Organization to prov:Organization [Organization Ontology] (from dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com on 2013-02-28)
- Re: ISSUE-58 (prov:Organization): Relate org:Organization to prov:Organization [Organization Ontology] (from ericphb@gmail.com on 2013-02-28)
- Re: ISSUE-58 (prov:Organization): Relate org:Organization to prov:Organization [Organization Ontology] (from dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-58 (prov:Organization): Relate org:Organization to prov:Organization [Organization Ontology] (from auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr on 2013-02-21)
- Re: ISSUE-58 (prov:Organization): Relate org:Organization to prov:Organization [Organization Ontology] (from dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com on 2013-02-21)
- Re: ISSUE-58 (prov:Organization): Relate org:Organization to prov:Organization [Organization Ontology] (from auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr on 2013-02-21)
- ISSUE-58 (prov:Organization): Relate org:Organization to prov:Organization [Organization Ontology] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-02-21)
Related notes:
Per 21-Feb-2013 telecon, DaveReynolds suggested he will approach ProvO WG and suggest either OWL:equivalentClass or rdfs:subClassOf relationship. This will be make it clear between the two WG's publishing vocabs about organizations, how they are intended to be used.
Bernadette Hyland, 21 Feb 2013, 15:33:08Per 21-Feb-2013 telecon, DaveReynolds confirmed he'll approach PROV-O WG to determine whether owl:equivalentClass or rdfs:subClassOf is more appropriate for relating org:Organization to prov:Organization. Goal is make it explicit in the two vocabs published by W3C re: organizations who they are intended to be used.
Bernadette Hyland, 21 Feb 2013, 15:34:36This issue has been closed, as it was decided not to provide any specific details on relations within the scope of this specification
Deirdre Lee, 28 Feb 2013, 16:13:09Display change log
