W3C

- DRAFT -

WAI AU

19 Dec 2011

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Regrets
Tim_B., Cherie_E.
Chair
Jutta Treviranus
Scribe
Jan

Contents


http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011OctDec/0101.html

1. SC A.1.2.1: Accessibility Guidelines

Resolution: SC A.1.2.1 Notes in SC and intent are approved

2. SC A.1.2.2 Platform Accessibility Services

Resolution: SC A.1.2.2 Note in SC approved

3. A.2.1.1 Text Alternatives for Rendered Non-Text Content

Resolution: All accept new example foe A2.1.1

4. A.3.6.3 Apply Platform Settings

The authoring tool respects platform display and control settings, unless they conflict with authoring tool display and control settings made by authors.

<jeanne> unless they are overwritten by display and control settings selected by authors within the tool.

The authoring tool respects platform display and control settings, unless authors have made more specific display and control settings using the authoring tool.

The authoring tool respects platform display and control settings, unless authors select more specific display and control settings using the authoring tool.

Resolution: All accept: "The authoring tool respects platform display and control settings, unless authors select more specific display and control settings using the authoring tool."

5. SC A.4.1.2 Settings Change Confirmation

@@The success criterion, therefore, requires that mechanisms for changing settings can also be used by authors to return the settings to their original values or, if the setting is not reversible with the same mechanism, the author will have had to confirm the setting.

@@The success criterion, therefore, requires that mechanisms for changing settings can also be used by authors to return the settings to their original values or, if the setting is not reversible with the same mechanism, the author will have had to confirm the setting.

Resolution: All accept: "The success criterion, therefore, requires that mechanisms for changing settings can also be used by authors to return the settings to their original values or, if the setting is not reversible with the same mechanism, the author will have had to confirm the setting."

6. B.2.4.1 Accessible Template Options (WCAG)

AC: "Note: It is recommended that the accessible options be identified, but this is not required." could go at end of inetnet

JR: With pointers to later SCs that do require indicators

Resolution: All approve of removing note from B.2.4.1.
... All approve of adding it to the intent of B.2.4.1..

7. Glossary entry: Accessibility Information

<AlastairC> Is this the link for the topic?

<AlastairC> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/ED-ATAG20-20111202/#def-Accessibility-Information

Keep this "@@Programmatically determinable information that accessible authoring practices may add to web content in order to meet a WCAG 2.0 success criterion (Level A, AA or AAA). Examples include: programmatically associated alternative content (e.g., text alternatives for images), role and state information for widgets, relationships within complex tables). " for GL...

Longer bulleted list in Implementing document

Full table in Implementing doc

as an appendix

8. Any objections to "tentative" Conformance section text added last week?

9. Part A Conformance Applicability Notes: Unrecognizable content:

@@Unrecognizable content: When success criteria require authoring tools to treat web content according to semantic criteria, the success criteria do not apply when these semantics are missing (e.g., text that describes an image is only considered to be a text alternative if this role is encoded within markup).

<AlastairC> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/ED-ATAG20-20111202/#part_a_applic_notes

Resolution: All accept: "Unrecognizable content: When success criteria require authoring tools to treat web content according to semantic criteria, the success criteria do not apply when these semantics are missing (e.g., text that describes an image is only considered to be a text alternative if this role is encoded within markup)."

Next call is Jan 9th, 2012

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.136 (CVS log)
$Date: 2011/12/19 21:05:26 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136  of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: Jan
Inferring Scribes: Jan

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: AC Alastair AlastairC Greg IPcaller JR Jan Jeanne Jutta P2 Sueann aaaa aabb
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy

Regrets: Tim_B. Cherie_E.
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011OctDec/0101.html
Got date from IRC log name: 19 Dec 2011
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/12/19-au-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]