<Ashok> scribenick: Seema

<Ashok> scribe: Seema

PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of F2F meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/11/22-RDB2RDF-minutes.html

RESOLUTION: Accept the minutes of F2F meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/11/22-RDB2RDF-minutes.html

ISSUE-58: turtle-introduction http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/58

<Ashok> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-58 without change. The sections pointed out as problematic have either been removed or considerably reworded since the issue was raised.

+1 to closing Issue 58

RESOLUTION: ISSUE-58 resolved

ISSUE-74: appendix-B2 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/74

PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-74 without change

RESOLUTION: ISSUE-74 resolved

ISSUE-75: tableName-sugar http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/75

David: there are still legitimate questions unanswered about Issue-75

Ashok: Leave ISSUE-75 open for now. Will discuss next week

ISSUE-76: default-termType http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/76

<Ashok> If rr:termType is not present on a template-valued object map, then rr:IRI is assumed. This is the case even if rr:datatype or rr:language are specified, which clearly indicate that the author desires literals to be created. This should perhaps be changed. This would require a different definition of “typeable term map” to avoid a circular definition.

+1 to Richard's proposal

ISSUE-77: xsd-c14n http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/77

PROPOSAL - Resolve ISSUE-76 by making the proposed changes mentioned in issue to the document

RESOLUTION: ISSUE-76 resolved

Ashok: Agree with Richard's proposal for resoling Issue-77

<ericP> +1

<Ashok> PROPOSAL: Resolve ISSUE-77 by referencing XSD 1.1 and insert whatever magic language is needed in the Status sections to allow doing that. Action on DM an R2RML editors to work out details with Ivan and implement

<joerg> +1

RESOLUTION: ISSUE-77 resolved

ISSUE-57: r2rml-document-syntax http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/57

<Ashok> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0106.html

Me and Souri would like further discussion on ISSUE-57. So, we would like to keep it open for now

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/67

Joerg: Who is the R2RML document targetted towards ?
... Would it be written by hand ? What would be the skill level of the person writing this mapping document ?
... Should I read it for correctness, ease-of-use, syntax ? Should there be an accompanying R2RML primer ?

ISSUE-67:http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/67

Eric: have not received any comments on choice of separation characters

PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-67

RESOLUTION: ISSUE-67 closed

Eric: The direct mapping document will use the %20 instead of + to represent a space character

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/73

David: Richard was to rewrite the algorithm.We will discuss this issue later. No action taken in today's call.

Eric: should look at outreach opportunites at ESWC. Abstract is due by Dec 5th

<ericP> ESCW 2012

<ericP> [[ Abstracts have to get submitted due December 5th, 2011 and full papers due to December 12th, 2011. ]]

<Ashok> ADJOURNED

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136  of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found ScribeNick: Seema
Found Scribe: Seema
Inferring ScribeNick: Seema
Present: Ashok Joerg Seema David._Seema Nuno Marcelo Eric
Regrets: Ivan Michael Souri Richard
Got date from IRC log name: 29 Nov 2011
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/11/29-RDB2RDF-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.