See also: IRC log
<scribe> ScribeNick: ArtB
<scribe> Scribe: Art
Date: 21 June 2011
AB: yesterday I posted a Draft Agenda ( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011AprJun/0127.html ). Since Laszlo sent regrets for today, I propose dropping Issue-17 and I'll follow-up with Laszlo to please address related Action-55. Any objections to that proposal?
[None: Issue-17 will not be included in today's call]
AB: if Doug doesn't join today's
call we also drop discussion on Issue-16 since he has related
action-53
... any other change requests?
AB: any short announcements for today?
MB: FF 6.0 will go to Beta in 2 weeks and it will include support for the Touch Events spec
AB: that's fantastic Matt; good work!
AB: Issue-3 ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/3 ) has open Action-52 for Matt ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/52 ). Anything to report on that today Matt? Last discussion was June 14 ( http://www.w3.org/2011/06/14-webevents-minutes.html#item03 )
MB: I still need to write the text and will get it done by the end of the month
AB: anything else on Issue-3 for today?
AB: we are skipping Issue-17 for today
AB: Issue-16 ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/16 ) has Action-53 for Doug ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/53 ). Anything to report on that today Doug? Last discussion was June 14 ( http://www.w3.org/2011/06/14-webevents-minutes.html#item04 )
DS: I've been working on other
Actions
... so nothing else to report today
AB: last week Issue-18 was
created ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/18
) and we need someone to provide inputs to address this issue.
The June 14 discussion ( http://www.w3.org/2011/06/14-webevents-minutes.html#item06
) provides some additional context.
... can we get someone to agree to provide some examples?
... we should address this issue before LC
DS: Sangwhan, can you take this?
SM: yes, I can take it
AB: thanks Sangwhan
<scribe> ACTION: moon submit an input to address Issue-18 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/06/21-webevents-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-57 - Submit an input to address Issue-18 [on Sangwhan Moon - due 2011-06-28].
AB: on June 14 we discussed a
plan for Last Call ( http://www.w3.org/2011/06/14-webevents-minutes.html#item06
) and that resulted in some sub-issues and actions.
... one consequence is splitting Touch Events spec ( http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents
) into Version/Level 1/2; who is going to do the work?
... who agreed to do the split?
DS: there are 2 parts
... 1st is to mark testable assertions
... and the classes of conformance
... and I am working on those assertions
... The 2nd part is splitting the stuff and Matt agreed to do
that
... Matt will do his split After I get done my part
AB: thanks for the clarification
DS: and we must do those 2 things
before going to LC
... I plan to complete my part this week
AB: that would be good to get
your part Doug, done this week
... Are we using "Version" or "Level"? What are the advantages
and disadvantages of each
DS: I don't care
<smaug> XHR is Level 1 & 2
AB: I dont' feel strongly either
DS: typically, a level is
considered B/C with previous specs
... but new Versions typically are not B/C
... but in this case, I think we want B/C
MB: initTouchEvent could give us some B/C issues
DS: so, then, perhaps we should go with versions
AB: does anyone object to going with versions?
[ None ]
RESOLUTION: we will use "Version" (not "Level") to distinguish the different Touch Events spec
AB: Doug agreed to Action-56: Update the Touch Event spec to use markup to facilitate test case extraction ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/56 ). What is the status of that Doug?
DS: yes, I am working on this
UNKNOWN_SPEAKER: and if there is no substantial agenda by the 27th, the meeting will be canceled
<Sangwhan> http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/spec-source-orientation.html
SM: let's talk about device orieintation after we get our spec to LC
DS: I agree we should take some
of that into account
... but talking about it after LC is fine with me
AB: anything else for
today?
... please address open actions and issues
... Meeting Adjourned
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found ScribeNick: ArtB Found Scribe: Art Present: Art_Barstow Cathy_Chan Matt_Brubeck Olli_Pettay Sangwhan_Moon Regrets: Laszlo_Gombos Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011AprJun/0127.html Found Date: 21 Jun 2011 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/06/21-webevents-minutes.html People with action items: an input moon submit[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]