<trackbot> Date: 27 August 2010

<scribe> Scribe: Yolanda Gil

<scribe> ScribeNick: YolandaGil

welcome back, Paul!!

<pgroth> hi yolanda

<jcheney> +q

<jcheney> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Analysis_of_Disease_Outbreak_Scenario

<jcheney> -q

<smiles> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Analysis_of_Business_Contract_Scenario#Relevant_State_of_the_Art

James has added many references and narrative to the relevant research of the Disease Outbreak scenario

<pgroth> it's readable

<pgroth> so nice

<pgroth> +q

<jcheney> maybe there is also related work on business workflows/processes?

<pgroth> speak like you're writing a paper :-)

<pgroth> lol

Simon wrote a narrative for the relevant provenance work in the Business Contract scenario. Will add subheadings to that.

Discussing gap analysis of Business Contract scenario

Starting with the DO gap analysis, we discuss what to remove or add

For content: all but the third bullet apply, we add something about ensuring provenance is complete enough for a proof, also linking provenance records to contract obligations

For management: all bullets apply, we add something about privacy and IP where not all provenance can be revealed, also link to law/policies

For use: all bullets apply, we add something about independent views, something about debugging because multiple experts can justify the proof

Next topic: Tagging status update

Daniel: many citations have been added, mostly for DO and NA scenarios
... 120 papers are now tagged