SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference -- 24 Aug 2010

<trackbot> Date: 24 August 2010

Appointment of the scribe

<scribe> Scribe: Mark

Approval of prior meeting minutes

Minutes approved with no amendments

Review the agenda

Mark: A couple of new issues raised in mailing list

Agenda approved with no amendments

Administrative items

Eric: Any value in F2F? May be useful to finish CR.

East coast / central US would be best, but it seems likely that travel restrictions would prohibit this.

Eric: Suggest we check whether travel approvals from our organisations are likely to be forthcoming, and how much lead time would be required. Two days should be sufficient.

Review action items

Eric: Some investigation done, but none complete

Derek: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/191 - discussed in list, and mail sent to list http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Aug/0015.html
... There will be some cases where a service provider would know that expected properties- e.g. targetService - have not been specified and so a fault could be thrown in these circumstances

Eric: Suggest Derek raises as a new issue

Mark: Originally thought that missing targetService would be untestable, but now agree with Derek that there are cases where a fault would be useful

Phil: soapAction is different from targetService - it's usually specified in the WSDL - could restrict the fault to properties specified in the WSDL

Eric: Discussion is centred around the clarity of the text and whether it would be solved by a fault

Derek: Will keep action open and raise an issue

Phil: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/197 - done

close action-197

<trackbot> ACTION-197 Create an alternate proposal for issue-55 resolution closed

Mark: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/199 - done

close action-199

<trackbot> ACTION-199 Review the proposal for issue 48 and make a counter proposal if he does not agree closed

Mark: action200 done

close action-200

<trackbot> ACTION-200 Apply the changes for issue 50 closed

Mark: Action 201 - still pending

Eric: Action 202 - still pending
... Will make the necesary changes once all issues have been resolved

Raised spec issues

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Aug/0016.html

Mark: New issue - complete WSDL example

RESOLUTION: No objections to opening this as an issue

<scribe> NEW ISSUE: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Aug/0017.html

Phil: Good idea - we should probably scrub the SOAP messages in the test cases too to check that they are using consistent encoding
... Suggest we review the test cases once the issues are resolved

action Phil to check the SOAP encoding in the test cases once the issues are resolved

<trackbot> Created ACTION-203 - Check the SOAP encoding in the test cases once the issues are resolved [on Phil Adams - due 2010-08-31].

RESOLUTION: No objections to opening this as an issue

Accepting proposals to close open issues

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/27 - leaving open

Eric: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/48

RESOLUTION: The proposal for Issue 48 is approved as written

action eric to apply the resolution for issue 48

<trackbot> Created ACTION-204 - Apply the resolution for issue 48 [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-08-31].

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/55 -

RESOLUTION: The proposal for Issue 55 is approved as written

action eric to apply the resolution for issue 55

<trackbot> Created ACTION-205 - Apply the resolution for issue 55 [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-08-31].

Accepting applied resolutions:

Accepting proposals to close open issues

<eric> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Aug/0016.html

Eric: The WSDL contains some spurious periods and incorrect angle bracket positions

Mark: Email seems to have been mangled - will send the WSDL file as an attachment to the list

RESOLUTION: The proposal for the Issue in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Aug/0016.html is approved - subject to the WSDL being correctly formed - see attached WSDL

action Eric to apply the resolution for the issue described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Aug/0016.html

<trackbot> Created ACTION-206 - Apply the resolution for the issue described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Aug/0016.html [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-08-31].

SOAP samples issue : http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Aug/0017.html

Mark: Needs more complete proposal - example messages

action mark to finish proposal for issue http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Aug/0017.html

<trackbot> Created ACTION-207 - Finish proposal for issue http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Aug/0017.html [on Mark Phillips - due 2010-08-31].