dbooth: a lot of progress has been made since 2003, and there are proposals now that would meet requirements
pfps: why did semweb best practices group didn't do this?
Guus: no one wanted to set up a task force for this
<jeremycarroll> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-assertion is the RDF Core issue
<jeremycarroll> link to the discussion at Tech Plenary
dbooth: back in 2003 i wasn't prepared to push a proposal
<jeremycarroll> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/meetings/tech-200303/#agenda 1600
dbooth: 3. co-reference vocabulary as alternative to owl:sameas
<jeremycarroll> on March 6th
cygri: i will add reference to Pat Hayes / Harry Halpin proposal
ivan: we should leave some
liberty to the WG to be chartered
... "seriously consider it, but you have the right to say
no"
<sandro> sandro: The main point of the mission: don't harm the compatibility -- that should trump everything.
guus: let's flag things that the WG really has to do
dbooth: four buckets? MUST do, SHOULD do, MAY do, MUST NOT do?
ivan: let's go through TOC
... Namespace and profiles Management: 0/6/10/0
... (these are MUST/SHUOLD/MAY/MUST NOT votes)
Turtle: 12/2/1/0
Turtle support for graph metadata: 10/4/1/0
RDF/XML named graph support: 5/10/3/2
JSON: 8/8/4/0
RDF(/XML) weak deprecations: 3/3/12/0
data model weak deprecations: 2/5/12/1
RDF/XML and RDF Concepts errata: 15/?/?/?
collection syntax in RDF/XML: 0/2/10/4
fix inference rules (ter horst): 10/8/0/0
blank nodes: 1/8/12/0
simplify rdf semantics: 1/5/8/4
archaisms: 0/3/10/0
literals as subjects: 0/1/6/12
named graph semantics: 16/2/0/0
graph identification (aka named graphs) 16/3/0/0
annotations 0/6/10/3
codify follow-your-nose 2/8/9/1
intended referent of URIs 0/0/10/6
coreference vocabulary 4/8/8/3
ivan: thanks natasha and
chris!
... and get that on the minutes!
... that's about it! thanks for coming! adjourned
<jun> thanks to the chairs
<AxelPolleres> we close with this version of the charter: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/index.php?title=RDF_Core_Charter_2010&oldid=1980
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: cygri Inferring Scribes: cygri WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: AndyS AxelPolleres Guus JSON Turtle archaisms cygri dbooth ekw ivan jeremycarroll jun pfps sandro You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/28-rdfn-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]