See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 09 March 2010
<scribe> scribe: padams
eric: need to clarify prior minutes that approval was granted to open issue-31
prior minutes approved
no comments
<scribe> no progress on actions 138, 143, 146, 147, 148
eric: last Thursday had a discussion in SCA bindings meeting; issue is in front of Oracle's lawyers, so progress is being made
re: issue 29, action 148 was opened to determine if a FAQ change might suffice for the issue
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/27
leave this open until we get the update
issues 30, 31 have no proposals yet to approve
correction: issues 30 and 31 have proposed resolutions that have been approved, but do not have applied resolutions to be accepted yet
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/22
<eric> This link shows applied resolution:
<eric> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?rev=1.74&content-type=text/html&f=h
<eric> Mark says he applied it here:
<eric> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jan/0026.html
Resolution: this applied resolution has been approved
<eric> Link to my email on changes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Mar/0001.html
<scribe> ACTION: eric to update testcase 6,7 to fix text in "message flow" section to reflect changes made to WSDL fragment [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/03/09-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-149 - Update testcase 6,7 to fix text in "message flow" section to reflect changes made to WSDL fragment [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-03-16].
changes look fine to Phil and Derek
We now have testcases to cover all assertions except 2014 and 2015
To declare our testsuite complete, we need to cover all assertions
<scribe> ACTION: phil to raise issue re: assertion 2014 and propose a resolution [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/03/09-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-150 - Raise issue re: assertion 2014 and propose a resolution [on Phil Adams - due 2010-03-16].
re: Assertion-2015, questions about whether this is even correct
<scribe> ACTION: eric to develop a proposal for how to address protocol-2015 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/03/09-soap-jms-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-151 - Develop a proposal for how to address protocol-2015 [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-03-16].
<scribe> ACTION: eric to address use of the word "may" in the second bullet of the soapjms:contentType description within the SOAP/JMS binding spec [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/03/09-soap-jms-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-152 - Address use of the word "may" in the second bullet of the soapjms:contentType description within the SOAP/JMS binding spec [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-03-16].
discussed strategy for testing
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: padams Inferring ScribeNick: padams WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: correction eric joined soap-jms trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 09 Mar 2010 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/03/09-soap-jms-minutes.html People with action items: eric phil WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]