ISSUE-115: Explanation on the Fragment ID in @about may be misleading
fragid explanation
Explanation on the Fragment ID in @about may be misleading
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDFa 1.1 Lite
- Raised by:
- Ivan Herman
- Opened on:
- 2011-11-06
- Description:
- See the mail sent by Sebastian Heath:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Nov/0025.html - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Official Response to ISSUE-115 from RDF Web Apps WG (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2012-01-28)
- Almost belated regrets (was Re: Telecon Agenda - December 1st 2011, 1400 UTC (from Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl on 2011-12-01)
- Telecon Agenda - December 1st 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-11-28)
- My opinions on the remaining issues (ISSUE-108, ISSUE-114, ISSUE-115, ISSUE-117, ISSUE-119, ISSUE-121) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-22)
- Just checking out where we are with RDFa issues (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-15)
- Re: Linking to @about in RDFa Lite? (ISSUE-115) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-06)
- ISSUE-115 (fragid explanation): Explanation on the Fragment ID in @about may be misleading [RDFa 1.1 Lite] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-06)
Related notes:
Editorial issue is address by changing the text to:
"If you want Web authors to be able to talk about the things on your page, you can identify the thing using a hash and a name."
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/WD-rdfa-lite-20120131/#about
The commenter has not replied on the fix that the WG proposed; issue is now closed.
Ivan Herman, 7 May 2012, 17:58:47Display change log