See also: IRC log
Date: 25 Feb 2010
<scribe> Meeting: 169
<scribe> Scribe: Norm
<scribe> ScribeNick: Norm
<scribe> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-agenda
-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-agenda
Accepted.
-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes
Accepted.
No regrets heard.
-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C021
Norm: I propose we close this without action.
Accepted.
-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C023
Vojtech: We now require a binding
in p:xpath-context, so what does the sentence in 4.4
mean.
... it says you need a default readable port.
Norm: Yes, I think an editorial change here makes sense, to explicitly note that the default readable port can be undefined
Proposal: Leave the status quo, with the editorial fix mentioned above.
Accepted.
-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C024
Norm describes the issue.
Norm: I don't feel strongly about it.
Vojtech: We do a similar thing with parameter input port.
Norm: I concede that this a little inconsistent.
Proposal: Allow required='false' when select is used on p:option
Vojtech: This change will also simplify tools that build pipelines.
Accepted.
-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C026
Vojtech: In 2008, we decided to add "try-namespace"
Norm: Ok, it was editorial sloppiness then
Proposal: Fix the bug, change to try-namespace.
Accepted.
-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C027
Norm: What if the document element is in no namespace.
Vojtech: Just ignore the hint.
Norm: I agree.
Proposal: Ignore the hint.
Accepted.
Norm: And if there isn't a document there, that's ok too.
General agreement
-> http://tests.xproc.org/results/comparison.html
Norm: We're done!
Henry: Woo hoo!
<alexmilowski> Yippie!
Norm: I assert that we have a complete test suite and two implementations of every relevant feature.
Paul: Congratulations.
Norm: I propose that we request transition to PR
Accepted.
<ht> http://tests.xproc.org/testsuite/
Norm: Henry, what are the next steps?
Henry: You put together a transition request, I review it, and you send it.
Paul: If you look at the draft transition request that I sent out for XLink 1.1, that should help.
None heard.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/true/too/ Found Scribe: Norm Inferring ScribeNick: Norm Found ScribeNick: Norm Present: Paul Norm Vojtech Mohamed Alex Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/25-agenda Found Date: 25 Feb 2010 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/25-xproc-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]