W3C

- DRAFT -

SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference

16 Feb 2010

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Regrets
Chair
Eric
Scribe
Mark

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 16 February 2010

<scribe> Scribe: Mark

Review action items

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open

Mark: Action 138 - still open
... Action 139 - done

close action-139

<trackbot> ACTION-139 Apply the resolution for issue 25 closed

Mark: Action 140 - done

close action-140

<trackbot> ACTION-140 Apply the resolution for issue 24 closed

Mark: Action 141 - done

close action-141

<trackbot> ACTION-141 Apply the resolution for issue 26 closed

Applied Resoulution for issues

http://www.w3.org/mid/OFB082B8A0.A60F118C-ON802576CC.0042F7AE-802576CC.00491A4B%2540uk.ibm.com

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Feb/0011.html

No objections to application resolution for Issue 24

RESOLUTION: Issue 24 can be closed

Issue 25 - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Feb/0009.html

No objections to applied resolution for Issue 25

RESOLUTION: Issue 25 can be closed

Issue 26 - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Feb/0012.html

No objections to applied resolution for Issue 26

RESOLUTION: Issue 26 can be closed

Test cases

Eric: We should talk about test cases 13-16

http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html#test0013

Test cases 13-14 are WSDL 1.1 - look like good basic tests to check at l;east some precedence rules have been implements

Eric: Test cases 6 & 7 have ReplyTo on the binding - not the most sensible place for the Reply parameter

<scribe> ACTION: Eric to revise test cases 6 & 7 to pick a more sensible property than replyToName to come from thewsdl binding [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-142 - Revise test cases 6 & 7 to pick a more sensible property than replyToName to come from thewsdl binding [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-02-23].

Eric: One more WSDL assertion to cover

<scribe> ACTION: Eric to ensure that we have tests for all the WSDL assertions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-143 - Ensure that we have tests for all the WSDL assertions [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-02-23].

Eric: We need to check that the test cases and the assertions still actually correspond in light of recent spec. changes
... This will be a big job - willing to do about half

Phil: Will look at the other half...

<scribe> ACTION: Phil to review half the test cases (and send a note to Eric saying which ones ) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-144 - Review half the test cases (and send a note to Eric saying which ones ) [on Phil Adams - due 2010-02-23].

<scribe> ACTION: Eric to review the other half of the test cases [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action04]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-145 - Review the other half of the test cases [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-02-23].

URI spec

Still pending Oracle's comeback on action in the SCA TC

Eric: Once document is published with new terms agreed we will resubmit to the IETF URI review list and then submit to be published (which could take 4 months)
... So having the latest IETF copyright terms will help to avoid procedural issues

AOB

None

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: Eric to ensure that we have tests for all the WSDL assertions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: Eric to review the other half of the test cases [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: Eric to revise test cases 6 & 7 to pick a more sensible property than replyToName to come from thewsdl binding [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Phil to review half the test cases (and send a note to Eric saying which ones ) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action03]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2010/02/16 17:46:13 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: mphillip
Found Scribe: Mark

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Eric Mark Phil joined padams padams2 soap-jms trackbot
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy

Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Feb/0008.html
Found Date: 16 Feb 2010
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html
People with action items: eric phil

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]