ISSUE-66: Should there be an ORDER BY for aggregates, particularly GROUP_CONCAT

Should there be an ORDER BY for aggregates, particularly GROUP_CONCAT

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
Opened on:
2011-02-15
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: Responses to Comments GK-1, DBeckett-1, and JB-4 (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-04-26)
  2. Re: Responses to Comments GK-1, DBeckett-1, and JB-4 (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-04-26)
  3. ISSUE-66: Should there be an ORDER BY for aggregates, particularly GROUP_CONCAT (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-02-15)

Related notes:

[LeeF]: RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-66 with no change to SPARQL 1.1 Query and mark it as a postponed issue from this WG

10 May 2011, 14:55:15

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 66.html,v 1.1 2013-03-28 18:39:09 brett Exp $