See also: IRC log
Hi Raphael
<raphael> Salut Steph
<raphael> I connect via phone, 1mn
ok
steph: process: this week final version by wed or thurs
the group agree, then move to W3C like document proof reading and publication
REsolution: include in the acknowledgment the list of people who actively participated in the group life and doc develoment in the last Six month
<scribe> ACTION: draft the list and propose it ot the mailing-list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/05-MW4D-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: stephane to draft the list and propose it ot the mailing-list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/05-MW4D-minutes.html#action02]
resolution: change acknowledgement to contributors
<raphael> +1
<scribe> ACTION: steph to rename the acknowledgement section to contributors [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/05-MW4D-minutes.html#action03]
<raphael> I don't think it makes a lot of sense, for the points you made and were made in previous sessions
renjish: discussed one year ago, should not integrate this section in this last phase
no spcific section to fit
Resolution: no integration in this version of the document of a section on health
(suggested by renjish)
<Renjish> SMS forum was working on the encoding aspect http://www.smsforum.net/
arun: might not be the future
that's why perhaps there is no investment
arun: is it worthwile to do it now ?
raphael: in lots countries, underusage of data service
gprs cheaper than sms
<ArunKumar> I agree with Raphael ... data and GPRS would soon overtake SMS in the text domain
<ArunKumar> So, it is not a question of voice vs SMS but is SMS the right mode for text modality
<raphael> yes indeed
<raphael> maybe also some level of icons
<raphael> +1
<ArunKumar> Yes mentioning the concern is fine
<Renjish> agreed and that's why it's not the technology itself but other factors that drive technology choice...
<raphael> For the record, I say that we should mention that data applications are under used and under created, consireing the comparative advantage, cost-wise (GPRS<<SMS)
<raphael> ok with your ccl, Steph
<Renjish> something's missing.. else the market forces would have tilted in favour of GPRS?
<raphael> "market forces" are also telecom op driven
<Renjish> so monopolistic...
<raphael> ohh yes
<raphael> on the good side, it allowed the telco explosion in dev. ctries
<Renjish> It's fine with me
<ArunKumar> 26th is fine with me
<Renjish> Raphael, can we then say that ignorance is the issue?
<raphael> thanks
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/fot/fit/ No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: steph Inferring Scribes: steph Default Present: steph, +41.22.730.aaaa, Raphael, +91.11.41.29.aabb, Arun, +01312799aacc, renjish Present: Stephane Raphael Arun Renjish Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mw4d/2009Oct/0009.html Got date from IRC log name: 05 Oct 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/10/05-MW4D-minutes.html People with action items: draft steph stephane WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]