See also: IRC log
zakim ??P4 is me
<asheth2> Zakim sees me (Amit Sheth) as Prateek
<asheth2> do we have URL for minutes?
<Holger> ScribeNick: Payam
Holger, we will wait til we have something represantable for the ontology
<Holger> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/images/2/2e/SemanticSensorNetworkOntology.pdf
on page 4, you have a figure, is that the core ontology?
Michael explaining the core ontology from the paper (page 4)
Amit, we can add other ontologies to the core; e.g OWL-time, geo-location
Amit, main dometions are spatial, temporal, and theme
<JohnGraybeal> I'm confused -- If we get sufficiently atomic, we don't have to model anything -- everything that describes a sensor can be found in some other ontology. ?
Amit, discussing need for an upper ontology and mapping to other concepts
<krp> No that's right!
<asheth2> Key issue is how to use an uppoer ontology and specific ontologies that bring in sensor, time, locaction and thematic dimensions-- the framework for this
John, there are multiple ontolgies which are contradictory; depending which ontology we choose, relations between cpncepts will be different
<michael> +q
Michael, the are Unit of measurments, location, etc. ontologies ... which are core aspects which need to there
+q
<michael> =q
<michael> +q
Action Michael to add a page to wiki regarding the ontology
<scribe> ACTION: Michael to add a page to wiki regarding the ontology [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/26-SSN-minutes.html#action01]
<krp> Sounds right for the EU
<Holger> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-ssn/2009Aug/0064.html
Holger: Timeslot(s) for telephone conferences
discussion on the timeslot to continue on the mailing list
before discussing extenstion packages on the ontologies; we need to discuss the current status of the ontology
John, whether this core satisfies the use case, and everybody should comment on this - it is on the wiki
Holger: one solution is having a dedicated phone call to discuss this, another solution discussing it in f2f meeting
<JohnGraybeal> the link is http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/Favorite_Use_Cases_List
<JohnGraybeal> instructions are at the top...
<michael> +1
<JohnGraybeal> +1
<krp> +1
[Action] all to discuss the usecase in two weeks
[Action] all to discuss the core concepts of the ontology
[Action]: all to discuss the usecase in two weeks
<michael> I'm putting up a wiki page aswell
[Action]: all to discuss the core concepts of the ontology
<michael> bye
<asheth2> uit
<krp> Bye
<asheth2> Quit
<asheth2> +quit
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found ScribeNick: Payam Inferring Scribes: Payam WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. Default Present: Holger, Payam, +1.202.408.aaaa, +1.650.450.aabb, krp, Prateek, michael Present: Holger Payam +1.202.408.aaaa +1.650.450.aabb krp Prateek michael WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Got date from IRC log name: 26 Aug 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/08/26-SSN-minutes.html People with action items: michael WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]