W3C

- DRAFT -

SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference

18 Aug 2009

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Regrets
Chair
eric
Scribe
peaston

Contents


 

 

<trackbot> Date: 18 August 2009

<scribe> Scribe: peaston

review prior minutes

Everyon: looks fine

Action Items

close: Action-103

close action-103

<trackbot> ACTION-103 Make the Issue-2 changes consistent with Issue-1 closed

close action-104

<trackbot> ACTION-104 reapply the resolution for issue 6 (remove JMS Priority) closed

Proposals for issues

<eric> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/open

Phil to send email with more specific proposal Issue 9

<eric> Discussion of issue 10: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/10

Issue 10 proposal is accepted

<scribe> ACTION: phil to apply issue 10 proposal [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/18-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-105 - Apply issue 10 proposal [on Phil Adams - due 2009-08-25].

<eric> (Added to agenda - discussion of applied resolution of 8)

<eric> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Aug/0018.html

<eric> About section C.2: http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html#soap-request-with-attachments

<eric> My original proposal to resolve: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Aug/0003.html

Consensus - revise wording to be JMS message type neutral and use content vs body

Apply to C1 also

Therefore Action-102 should be applied using new proposed language in email

Accepting applied resolutions

<eric> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?rev=1.59&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1#Protocol-2019

<eric> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?rev=1.59&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1#Protocol-2022

<eric> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?rev=1.59&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1#Protocol-2038

COnsensus: All agree

<Phil> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?rev=1.59&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1#Protocol-2040

<eric> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?rev=1.58&content-type=text/html&f=h

<Phil> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?rev=1.58&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1#Protocol-2040

Consensus: All agree to resolution of issue 7 as applied

FAQ

<eric> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/wiki/2008-09_FAQ

Do we need a UDDI FAQ

<scribe> ACTION: Eric to propose UDDI FAQ [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/18-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-106 - Propose UDDI FAQ [on Eric Johnson - due 2009-08-25].

Testing

<scribe> ACTION: Phil to regen testing tables etc [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/18-soap-jms-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-107 - Regen testing tables etc [on Phil Adams - due 2009-08-25].

Most test cases leverage the endpoint defn without the wsdl

Phil: some endpoint expressed tests could be done as WSDL tests

eric: i.e reuse existing test cases ?

we could redo our tests to have a wsdl form vs an ep form

eric: lets do an example of this for one of our tests?

Action eric to come up with a more concrete proposal on the wsdl testing

<trackbot> Created ACTION-108 - Come up with a more concrete proposal on the wsdl testing [on Eric Johnson - due 2009-08-25].

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: Eric to propose UDDI FAQ [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/18-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: phil to apply issue 10 proposal [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/18-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Phil to regen testing tables etc [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/18-soap-jms-minutes.html#action03]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2009/08/18 17:00:51 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: peaston
Inferring ScribeNick: peaston

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Everyon Peter_Easton Phil Yves alewis close eric joined soap-jms trackbot
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy

Found Date: 18 Aug 2009
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/08/18-soap-jms-minutes.html
People with action items: eric phil

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]