WAI AU -- 18 May 2009

<Jan> Chair: Jan

<Jan> Scribe: Greg

Determine whether to publish the new Editor's Draft as a Public WD

Call out sections that are new or changed

<Jan> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2009/ED-ATAG20-20090512/

Options are accept, change prior to release as public working draft

<Jan> Authoring tools are just one aspect of Web accessibility....

<jtrevir> First changes to introduction. 3rd note under first paragraph.

<Jan> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2009/ED-ATAG20-20090512/

<jeanne> +1 accept

<jtrevir> No objections accepted.

Note 3 in Introduction "Authoring tools are just one aspect of accessibility... ACCEPTED

<Jan> All: Accept new org. of componetnst of accessibility.

<jtrevir> 2nd: Change to notes in definition, range of tools ATAG replies to. In response to Greg's comments.

1.ATAG 2.0 applies to a wide variety of Web content generating applications...

Change to notes in Definition "ATAG 2.0 applies to a wide variety..."

<Jan> GP: Meets my concerns

<jeanne> +1 acce[t

<Jan> All: Accept wording of range of authoring tools

ATAG 2.0 Layers of Guidance

<jtrevir> 3rd: layers of guidance, adapted from WCAG.

ATAG 2.0 Layers of Guidance Replaces Organization of the Document

<Jan> All: Accept "layers of guidance"

Editor's note can be removed

Relationship to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0

<jtrevir> Reference to WCAG 1.0 removed.

<jtrevir> First bullet revised.

<Jan> GP: Wonder about third bullet...

<jtrevir> GP: evidence of conformance requiring content is a concern

<jtrevir> Should this section be normative or informative?

<jtrevir> GP: May not be possible to provide content in a conformance claim

<jtrevir> JR: is the 3rd bullet required?

<jtrevir> Jeanne: It should be removed, as it is inconsistent.

<Jan> ACTION: jeanne to Remove •ATAG 2.0 Conformance Claims are to be supported by examples of Web content produced by the authoring tool (e.g., samples of automatically-generated content) that conform to WCAG 2.0. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/18-au-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-145 - Remove •ATAG 2.0 Conformance Claims are to be supported by examples of Web content produced by the authoring tool (e.g., samples of automatically-generated content) that conform to WCAG 2.0. [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-05-25].

<jtrevir> JR: any other objection?

<Jan> All: No other objections to rewording of "Relationship to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0"

<jtrevir> All: section is normative.

<Jan> Resolved: Add "This section is normative." to Relationship to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0" section

<jtrevir> To be explicitly noted with section.

<Jan> Resolved: "Integration of Accessibility Features " and "ATAG 2.0 Layers of Guidance" remain infromative

<jtrevir> GP: B .1.3.1 Priority level not noted.

<Jan> ACTION: jeanne to B.3.1.1 add Level [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/18-au-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-146 - B.3.1.1 add Level [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-05-25].

<jtrevir> GP: There are two B.2.4.4s

<Jan> ACTION: jeanne to B.2.4.4 to B.2.4.5 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/18-au-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-147 - B.2.4.4 to B.2.4.5 [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-05-25].

<jtrevir> GP: Have created analysis of success criteria for editors draft.

<jtrevir> GP: with a breakdown of priority levels. Created as indicator of effort required for task of compliance.

<jtrevir> GP: will send it along to working group.

Guideline B.1.1 Support Web content technologies that enable the creation of content that is accessible

<jtrevir> JR: Was broken down into 3 levels of compliance.

<Jan> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#new-terms

<jtrevir> Referencing WCAG 2.0

<jtrevir> WCAG does not break the definition of accessible technologies into levels.

<jtrevir> GP: Automatically selected for what?

<Jan> ACTION: jeanne to Label B.1.1 for F2F discussion [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/18-au-minutes.html#action04]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-148 - Label B.1.1 for F2F discussion [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-05-25].

B.1.1.1 for further discussion at face to face

Level of Conformance

<Jan> ↑In order to ensure that the process of using ATAG 2.0 and WCAG 2.0 together in the development of authoring tools is as simple as possible

<Jan> ...

<jtrevir> JR: this is informative, suggest it be moved to an appendix.

<jtrevir> editorial changes and grammar edits required.

<Jan> JR: cannot make content accessible↑ => cannot make the authoring tool user interface accessible

<Jan> JR: 4th bullet: Success Criteria => Success Criterion

<jtrevir> Jeanne: Should this be in the introduction? Do not want it in an appendix, it will be ignored.

<jtrevir> Andrew, Greg and Jutta: should stay in.

<Andrew> My Skype just dropped out but i would agree with Jeanne

<jtrevir> JR: Suggested title: Understanding ATAG Conformance Levels

<jtrevir> JR: Move to last section of Introduction as informative section.

<Jan> ACTION: jeanne to Move the section on setting Conformance Levels to the a new last sub-scetion in the Introduction [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/18-au-minutes.html#action05]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-149 - Move the section on setting Conformance Levels to the a new last sub-scetion in the Introduction [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-05-25].

<Jan> First para: ↑In order to ensure that the process

<Jan> ....might place on developers)

<Jan> DELETE: ↑Conformance Levels in Conformance Claims

Publish Public WD?

<Jan> Andrew: Yes

<jtrevir> Greg: Yes

<jtrevir> Jeanne: Yes

<jtrevir> SueAnn: Yes

<jtrevir> Jutta: Yes

<jtrevir> Jan: Yes

<jtrevir> JR: will clean up draft and publish late this week.

<jtrevir> Next Week memorial day

<jtrevir> Will meet in 2 weeks time.

<jtrevir> 10 days from face to face

<jtrevir> 2 meetings in June before F2F

<jtrevir> SEnd any concerns before Last Call draft.

- DRAFT -

WAI AU

18 May 2009

Attendees

Contents