ISSUE-44
beyond \'who\' (some day) (pubic comment)
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- wsc-usecases
- Raised by:
- Bill Doyle
- Opened on:
- 2007-04-15
- Description:
- From public comments
 raised by: Al Gilman Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org
 
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-usable-
 authentication/2007Apr/0000.html
 
 
 beyond \'who\' (some day)
 where it says, in 4.3 Entity identification
 Recommending a presentation for these
 designators that helps the user recognize which entity they are
 currently conversing with, and when they are switching to a
 different entity, is a primary concern of this Working Group.
 please consider
 The likely shape of a better world of trust includes the terms of the
 engagement beyond just \'who.\' Absolutely, the state of what works today is
 limited to \"who\" am I talking to.
 And DNS domains are about as scientific a \'who\' as users ever resolve in their
 fuzzy brains, by way of entities that are not human individuals.
 On the other hand, there is still a lot of dissatisfaction from consumers
 about organizations taking information disclosed for a finite purpose and
 redistributing it beyond what the user understood as the purpose of that
 disclosure. So the group should be aware of contemporary work to model trust
 decisions in terms of contextual integrity where the parameteters of a context
 desiring integrity are the defining characteristics of shared tasks as well as
 who is in or out of the circle of the conversation.
 
 please consider
 attribute certificates in the picture, eventually (bearer is known to me and
 assertion/attribute is true about said bearer). User can provide a voucher
 for certified quality, not requiring disclosure of user\'s identity.
 Why?
 The parking meter needs to know you are a qualifying individual to use
 disabled parking spots, but it does not need to know exactly who you are.
 There are, in the best of all possible worlds, many correlates for this in the
 world of B2C transactions. So while a clear communication of \"who is in the
 scene, and who am I conversing with?\" is the name of the game for now, the
 total picture in the long term may use attribute certificates as well as
 identity certificates
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-44: beyond \\\'who\\\' (some day) (pubic comment) (from sduffy@aol.net on 2007-05-01)
- Re: ISSUE-44: beyond \\\'who\\\' (some day) (pubic comment) (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2007-04-18)
- ISSUE-44: beyond \\\'who\\\' (some day) (pubic comment) (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2007-04-15)
 
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log