ISSUE-190
relaxedpathvalidation
Relaxed Path Validation - optional, recommended?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- wsc-xit
- Raised by:
- Ian Fette
- Opened on:
- 2008-04-16
- Description:
- This blocks on ACTION-416
It seems bad to have different browsers doing different things for the same site, specifically regarding whether SSL errors are displayed or not. I think we need to be consistent in whether we tell people to use relaxed path validation for normal (non-AA) certs or not. I.e. we should specify whether by default, relaaxed path validation should be used, or whether it's just an option that we expect 0.0001% of users to enable. - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-439 on Anil Saldhana to Remove relaxed path validation section and references - due 2008-05-20, closed- Related emails:
- Meeting record: 2008-05-13 (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-06-06)
- Meeting record: 2008-05-07 (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-06-06)
- WSC WG f2f May 2008 Agenda (v 1.1) (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-05-09)
- Re: ISSUE-190: axe relaxed path validation? (from stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie on 2008-05-07)
- ISSUE-190: axe relaxed path validation? (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-05-07)
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-05-07 (from hahnt@us.ibm.com on 2008-05-06)
- Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-05-07 (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-05-06)
- ISSUE-190 relaxedpathvalidation Relaxed Path Validation - optional, recommended? (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-05-02)
- WSC WG f2f May 2008 Agenda (v 1.0) (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-05-02)
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-04-30 (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-04-29)
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-04-30 (from egelman@cs.cmu.edu on 2008-04-29)
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-04-30 (from maritzaj@cs.columbia.edu on 2008-04-29)
- Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-04-30 (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-04-29)
- Re: ISSUE-190 (relaxedpathvalidation): Relaxed Path Validation - optional, recommended? [wsc-xit] (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-04-24)
- ISSUE-190 (relaxedpathvalidation): Relaxed Path Validation - optional, recommended? [wsc-xit] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-04-16)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
