ISSUE-129
Should we say anything about scoring techniques?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- wsc-xit-past-062008
- Raised by:
- Thomas Roessler
- Opened on:
- 2007-10-11
- Description:
- [1] currently mandates the use of a scoring system to aggregate the various context information. This topic was discussed at some length (but not resolved) at the 2/3 October face-to-face. It is not, at this point, clear whether this recommendation should remain in the document.
1. http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#page-score - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-374 on Tim Hahn to Rewrite page security score section - due 2008-01-23, closed- Related emails:
- Draft Minutes for 2009-01-21 (from maritzaj@cs.columbia.edu on 2009-01-22)
- Meeting record: WSC WG weekly 2008-01-30 (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-02-13)
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG weekly 2008-01-30 (from egelman@cs.cmu.edu on 2008-01-30)
- RE: Agenda: WSC WG weekly 2008-01-30 (from dan.schutzer@fstc.org on 2008-01-29)
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG weekly 2008-01-30 (from johnath@mozilla.com on 2008-01-29)
- Agenda: WSC WG weekly 2008-01-30 (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-01-29)
- RE: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-01-24)
- Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from johnath@mozilla.com on 2008-01-24)
- RE: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from weburn@hisoftware.com on 2008-01-24)
- RE: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com on 2008-01-24)
- Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from egelman@cs.cmu.edu on 2008-01-24)
- Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from egelman@cs.cmu.edu on 2008-01-24)
- Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from ifette@google.com on 2008-01-24)
- RE: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com on 2008-01-24)
- RE: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from dan.schutzer@fstc.org on 2008-01-24)
- Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from ifette@google.com on 2008-01-23)
- Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from hahnt@us.ibm.com on 2008-01-23)
- Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from ifette@google.com on 2008-01-23)
- Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from hahnt@us.ibm.com on 2008-01-23)
- Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from ifette@google.com on 2008-01-23)
- Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from hahnt@us.ibm.com on 2008-01-23)
- Re: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-01-23)
- Meeting record: WSC WG weekly 2008-01-16 (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-01-23)
- RE: ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com on 2008-01-23)
- Re: Weekly meeting minutes, Jan 16 2008 (from janv@opera.com on 2008-01-23)
- ACTION-374 - proposed re-written text for 6.3, Page Security Score (from hahnt@us.ibm.com on 2008-01-23)
- Weekly meeting minutes, Jan 16 2008 (from janv@opera.com on 2008-01-17)
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-01-16 (from ifette@google.com on 2008-01-15)
- Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-01-16 (from egelman@cs.cmu.edu on 2008-01-15)
- Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-01-16 (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-01-15)
- Re: ISSUE-129: Should we say anything about scoring techniques? [Techniques] (from ifette@google.com on 2007-10-30)
- Re: ISSUE-129: Should we say anything about scoring techniques? [Techniques] (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2007-10-30)
- Re: ISSUE-129: Should we say anything about scoring techniques? [Techniques] (from tlr@w3.org on 2007-10-11)
- RE: ISSUE-129: Should we say anything about scoring techniques? [Techniques] (from michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com on 2007-10-11)
- Re: ISSUE-129: Should we say anything about scoring techniques? [Techniques] (from egelman@cs.cmu.edu on 2007-10-11)
- ISSUE-129: Should we say anything about scoring techniques? [Techniques] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-10-11)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log