ISSUE-135
Last Call Comment: rdfs:label
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SKOS
- Raised by:
- Alistair Miles
- Opened on:
- 2008-09-30
- Description:
Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]: """ What is the rational for making SKOS labeling properties sub properties of rdfs:label (besides the common name)? Note that rdfs:Label is an owl:AnnotationProperty in OWL. While in OWL Full, annotation properties can have sub properties, it looks at least a little odd (though formally fine) to have a data property be a sub property of an annotation property. If no strong reasons talk against, I suggest to /not/ have sub properties of rdfs:label. """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-135: Last Call Comment: rdfs:label (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-09-30)
- Re: Review of the 'SKOS Reference' Last Call Working Draft (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-09-30)
- Status of LC comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-06)
- meeting record: 2008-10-07 SWD WG (from swick@w3.org on 2008-10-07)
- RE: Status of LC Comments ISSUE-135 (from jeremy@topquadrant.com on 2008-11-10)
- ISSUE-135: SKOS labels as annotations? (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-11-14)
- meeting record: 2008-11-18 SWD WG telecon (from swick@w3.org on 2008-11-18)
- [ALL] agenda 25 Nov telecon - 1600 UTC (from schreiber@cs.vu.nl on 2008-11-25)
- ISSUE-135 draft response (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-11-25)
- Re: [ALL] agenda 25 Nov telecon - 1600 UTC (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-11-25)
- meeting record: 2008-11-25 SWD WG telecon (from swick@w3.org on 2008-11-25)
- Re: ISSUE-135: Last Call Comment: rdfs:label (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-02)
- [SKOS] Update on Last Call Comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-02)
- meeting record: 2008-12-02 SWD WG telecon (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-12-03)
- RE: ISSUE-135: Last Call Comment: rdfs:label (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-12-04)
- Re: ISSUE-135: Last Call Comment: rdfs:label (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-09)
- Re: ISSUE-135: Last Call Comment: rdfs:label (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-09)
- RE: ISSUE-135: Last Call Comment: rdfs:label (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-12-10)
Related notes:
2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept
2008-12-02: CHANGE-TYPE: Substantive
2008-12-02: RESOLUTION: In the current schema, these [skos:prefLabel, skos:altLabel, skos:hiddenLabel] are asserted to be instances of owl:DatatypeProperty. On reflection, we feel that it is more appropriate to type these as owl:AnnotationProperty and retain the subproperty relationship. Although this will still violate an OWL DL constriant (no subproperty relationships are allowed on annotation properties), it is likely that changes in OWL 2 will allow relationships between annotation properties. It may then be possible to represent SKOS in terms which conform to OWL 2 with minimal changes. The Working Group thus propose to change the type of the SKOS labelling properties to owl:AnnotationProperty, and *postpone* this issue (indicating that it may merit further consideration in the future).
2008-12-11: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial
2008-12-15: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept