Disposition of comments for the Web Applications Working Group

All

Here are some of the comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ W3C
Working Draft 5 October 2010

1. 7.9.2. The email Attribute

mentions that email is a keyword attribute where

A keyword is a string that is reserved for the purpose of this
specification. The value of a keyword attribute is a keyword that is
one of a finite set specified in the attribute's definition in the case
given in this specification.

Does this mean that the finite set will be defined in the specification
? or the spec assumes that there will be a finite set based on the
attributes definition in the specification.

This would mean that the email attribute can only hold emails and not
any other string ?

For param element's name and value attributes, how is the finite set
defined ? Do we let the feature defined specify the set ?

2. 9.1.9. Rule for Getting Text Content with Normalized White Space

In the example given, is the dir attribute for Dude ignored ? The
sentence "The resulting widget name would be "The Awesome Super Dude
Widget" but represented as a localizable string that retains" does not
seem complete


3. 7.11. The icon Element and its Attributes

Attributes:
Global attributes, src, width, height.

global attributes, xml.lang does not apply as mentioned in the spec.
dir also would not apply to icon element ?
Is Global attributes required as an attribute to icon element.

Same thing applies to content element, feature element, param element

rgds
viji