This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Other specs in this tool Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group's Issue tracker
Quick access to LC-1464 LC-1465 LC-1466 LC-1467 LC-1468
Next: LC-1466
n the mobileOK 1.0 draft, label [1] appears to be the source of authenticity. Have you considered a lightweight text-based logo styled in CSS? From 1.4.3 Visual Representation [2]: "Content which bears a mobileOK label may optionally advertise this by displaying a mobileOK logo (to be produced)..." The example below condensed is about 200 bytes. A CSS expert can improve on that no doubt. :-). I don't know if the mobileOK mark is meant to be a service mark, or a trademark or if the strings would need to be protected by patent, copyright or trade or service mark registration. Apologies in advance if I misunderstood, and the spec means that the logo itself needs to be hard to forge. <a id="mobileOK" href="http://www.example.com/mobileOK/#id4485358">mobileOKâ„¢</a> a#mobileOK { margin-left: 0; padding: 0.05% 0.3%; background: #fff; color: #093; text-decoration: none; font: bold smaller sans-serif; } [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK/#id4477838 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK/#id4485358