Edit comment LC-519 for Accessibility Guidelines Working Group

Quick access to

Previous: LC-794 Next: LC-1075

Comment LC-519: Comment Shortname:; Commenter: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>; Message-id:; Section of the document concerned:

or; Refinement of the section concerned:; Status:
assigned to; Type:; Resolution status:
Response drafted Resolution implemented Reply sent to commenter; Response status:
No response from Commenter yet Commenter approved disposition Commenter objected to disposition
Commenter's response (URI):; Comment:
Part of Item: Techniques
Comment Type: GE
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):

Refer to paragraphs under Advisory Techniques for Guideline x.x starting with "Specific techniques for ..." and ending with "more accessible to more people."

Comment:

The fact that there are two categories is already stated in the introductory content at the start of the doc. The paragraph that follows this heading is unnecessarily repetitive.

Proposed Change:

Consider replacing with headings like:

- Advisory Techniques for Guideline x.x (general, not criteria specific)
- Advisory Techniques for Guideline x.x (criteria specific)

(If there are none under either category, a single word following the heading saying, Ã¢â‚¬Å“NoneÃ¢â‚¬Â?, is sufficient). The recommendation made is consistent with other headings like: Technology-Specific Techniques; Related issues: (space separated ids); WG Notes: [EDITORZ] GV BC 1) DONE Retitle " Advisory Techniques for Guideline X.X" to " Advisory Techniques for Guideline X.X (not success criteria specific)" XML Source updated 28 June 2006 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Jun/0058.html; Resolution: The intent is that users jump to these "Understanding Guideline x.x" modules directly from the guidelines. As a result, they will not have read the introduction. Thus the redundancy in this paragraph with text that is in the introduction. We think retitling " Advisory Techniques for Guideline X.X" is a good idea and have retitled it to " Advisory Techniques for Guideline X.X (not success criteria specific)" Regarding just putting "none" we don't want people to think there are no advisory techniques, and since this doc may be broken into separate docs for each success criteria, we want to keep directions as to where to look for the other advisory techniques.; (Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)