Edit comment LC-1093 for Accessibility Guidelines Working Group

Quick access to

Previous: LC-1092 Next: LC-785

Comment LC-1093: Comment Shortname:; Commenter: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>; Message-id:; Section of the document concerned:

or; Refinement of the section concerned:; Status:
assigned to; Type:; Resolution status:
Response drafted Resolution implemented Reply sent to commenter; Response status:
No response from Commenter yet Commenter approved disposition Commenter objected to disposition
Commenter's response (URI):; Comment:
Example - A stock ticker: Doesn't this example violate 1.1.1? If someone stops the stock ticker and therefore misses out on some information shouldn't that information be provided elsewhere?

Proposed Change:

Clarify example; Related issues: 772 1092
(space separated ids); WG Notes: [TEAMC] [] related issue 772, 1092 ALS: Modifying the example as proposed in LC-772 will resolve this issue. Discussed in the 28 September 2006 telecon: LC772: accept as amended LC1092, LC 1093 accept as amended http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2006/09/28-wai-wcag-minutes.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Jul/0090.html; Resolution: Thank you for pointing this out. It was also pointed out by another reviewer that the sufficient technique for this success criterion requires paused content to be restarted from the point where it was stopped but with a notice that the display is delayed. This example has been modified to say the ticker will restart from the point where it was paused so that all trades that occurred while it was paused will be displayed. However, if a control to turn off (rather than pause) the presention of real-time information via non-text content (ex. an applet) were present, there would be no requirement that the information that was not displayed during the time it was turned off would be available.; (Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)