W3C

Edit comment LC-2824 for Accessibility Guidelines Working Group

Quick access to

Next: LC-2819

Comment LC-2824
:
Commenter: Duff Johnson <duff@duff-johnson.com>

or
Resolution status:

A general comment based on an (admittedly somewhat cursory) read of the rest of this draft of WCAG2ICT.

Insofar as it seems valuable to attempt to apply WCAG 2.0 to ICT generally (I won't dwell on this for now), I think this specific approach, while not without value, largely serves to demonstrate the gulf between abstract generalizations and technical reality as implemented.

At the end of the day: is there enough information here to allow (say) a government agency to craft policies to cover web pages *and* desktop software *and* mobile software *and* electronic documents (PDF, XLSX, etc) *and* ATMs, and and and and….? Or… pick on just documents. Would a Section 508 coordinator be better-informed as to how to implement a "WCAG 2.0 policy" based on this document? Would a software developer have a better understanding of how to invest time in electronic document software development because of WCAG2ICT?

I think those are the questions that I was hoping this document would answer a bit more than it does.
(space separated ids)
(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)


Developed and maintained by Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (dom@w3.org).
$Id: 2824.html,v 1.1 2017/08/11 06:40:50 dom Exp $
Please send bug reports and request for enhancements to w3t-sys.org