This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Other specs in this tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group's Issue tracker
Quick access to LC-2651 LC-2652 LC-2653 LC-2654 LC-2655 LC-2656 LC-2657 LC-2658 LC-2659 LC-2660 LC-2661 LC-2662 LC-2663 LC-2664 LC-2665 LC-2666 LC-2667 LC-2668 LC-2669 LC-2670 LC-2671 LC-2672 LC-2673 LC-2674 LC-2675 LC-2676 LC-2677 LC-2678 LC-2679 LC-2680 LC-2681 LC-2682 LC-2686 LC-2687 LC-2688 LC-2689 LC-2690 LC-2691 LC-2692 LC-2693 LC-2694 LC-2695 LC-2698 LC-2700 LC-2701 LC-2702 LC-2817 LC-2818
Previous: LC-2654 Next: LC-2700
Going beyond direct substitution of “web page” if/where necessary Thus far in the Success Criteria that WCAG2ICT addressed in this first public draft, you have managed to develop guidance based on a direct substitution of the phrase “web page” (or “set of web pages” or other variant). You haven't done so with a single, global substitution which we think is wise – particularly in the non-web software world we don't believe there is a single replacement that works for all Success Criteria. However, we are concerned that you may feel constrained in your work of determining how to apply WCAG to non-web ICT to only modify a few words here and there in various Success Criteria. Nothing in your Work Statement<http://www.w3.org/2012/04/WCAG2ICT-WorkStatement.html> puts such a limitation on you. In this draft you haven't proposed language for applying some of the Success Criteria that we feel are particularly difficult to apply to non-web ICT (as detailed in the section “WCAG 2.0 Conformance” in our comments submitted in response to the 2011 ANPRM<http://www.regulations.gov/#%21documentDetail;D=ATBCB-2011-0007-0074>) and we encourage you to explore broader changes of the wording of those difficult Success Criteria. Such changes may enable you to find a way to apply those Success Criteria to non-web ICT.