Edit comment LC-2595 for Accessibility Guidelines Working Group

Quick access to

Previous: LC-2703 Next: LC-2628

Comment LC-2595
Commenter: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@googlemail.com>

Resolution status:

It seems that there are some problems concerning different versions of techniques which might be confusing for users. Two examples:

Example 1:

* T3 (older version, Working Draft?): http://www.w3.org/WAI/PA/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-TECHS/text.html#T3

* T3 (new version): http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-TECHS/T3.html

Example 2:

* H69 (Editor's Draft): http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20090105/H69

* H69 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20120103/H69)

As long as users are following the links (recommendation -> SC -> How to meet) they won't come along other versions (working drafts?, example 1) or older Editor's Drafts. But if they come along through a search engine, there is no information about the status of the single documents as long users don't follow the link "contents" and scroll to the top where they find "Editor's Draft January - July 2009".

Proposed Change:
Adding a clear note about the status of older documents.
(space separated ids)
(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)

Developed and maintained by Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (dom@w3.org).
$Id: 2595.html,v 1.1 2017/08/11 06:39:57 dom Exp $
Please send bug reports and request for enhancements to w3t-sys.org