Edit comment LC-2970 for Timed Text Working Group

Previous: LC-2969 Next: LC-2967

Comment LC-2970: Comment Shortname:; Commenter: chaals <chaals@yandex-team.ru>; Message-id:; Section of the document concerned:

or; Refinement of the section concerned:; Status:
assigned to; Type:; Resolution status:
Response drafted Resolution implemented Reply sent to commenter; Response status:
No response from Commenter yet Commenter approved disposition Commenter objected to disposition
Commenter's response (URI):; Comment:
Editorial:

5.7
The definitions of each item here would be far clearer with an actual example.
It would be very helpful to choose a single formalism for syntax.

The example of an attribute which *I think* can be either

ittp:progressivelyDecodable="true"
or
ittp:progressivelyDecodable="false"
would be more helpful if it were described much as the following attribute, which says what elements it applies to, what values it can take, etc.; Related issues: (space separated ids); WG Notes: > It would be very helpful to choose a single formalism for syntax. As a profile of TTML 1, IMSC 1 follows TTML 1 conventions (TTML Section 2.3), which is different between parameters and style attributes. > The definitions of each item here would be far clearer with an actual example. Ok.; Resolution: We have: - added a "document convention" section to IMSC1 - added one XML snippet example for each feature introduced by IMSC 1 These are in the editor's draft at: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml-ww-profiles/ttml-ww-profiles.html; (Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)