ISSUE-69: Should there be a Core schema incldued in BLD and PRD schemata?
Core schema
Should there be a Core schema incldued in BLD and PRD schemata?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Technical Design (multiple dialects/documents)
- Raised by:
- Christian de Sainte Marie
- Opened on:
- 2008-07-15
- Description:
- How the BLD and PRD schemas should interrelate -- should they both include a Core schema so we are sure about what the syntactic subset is, or are the schemas separate and we have to check by hand that instances overlap as intended?
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: [Admin] Agenda for F2F11 (from Adrian.Paschke@gmx.de on 2008-09-20)
- [Admin] draft minutes of 22 July 2008 telecon (from mdean@bbn.com on 2008-07-22)
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon July 22 (from csma@ilog.fr on 2008-07-21)
- ISSUE-69 (Core schema): Should there be a Core schema incldued in BLD and PRD schemata? [Technical Design (multiple dialects/documents)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-07-15)
Related notes:
<sandro> RESOLVED: Close issue-69; there will be a Core schema, included in BLD and PRD schemas. see ACTION-692.
http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-rif-irc#T21-52-29
Display change log
