<shawn-MEL> ACTION: SLH - [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: SLH - slides to be predominantly im ages, add extra text and notes to slides as "handout" div in slidy <div class="handout"> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action02]
<shawn-MEL> ACTION: CHANGELOG - slides to be predominantly im ages, add extra text and notes to slides as "handout" div in slidy <div class="handout"> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action03]
<scribe> ACTION: CHANGELOG "Essential Components Interdependent" slide - change "WAI guidelines" to emphasise 'multiple' guidelines (not just WCAG) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action04]
Helle: pointed out the restating the MYTH all the time actually reinforces the myth
<scribe> ACTION: CHANGELOG "Essential Components Interdependent" slide - remove MYTH and state in the positive. move myth discussion to speakers notes [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action05]
<scribe> ACTION: CHANGELOG - add to consider later list - expand notes to include the three groups in "Content Develper" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action06]
<scribe> ACTION: CHANGELOG - examples slide - add to "alt image" the HTML spec bit [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action07]
<scribe> ACTION: CHANGELOG - low priority - cleanup examples slide image overlaps [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action08]
<scribe> ACTION: CHANGELOG - Examples slide - break into three parts and build - a) checkpoint + content b) add in developer + tools c) add in user + UA & AT [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action09]
<scribe> ACTION: CHANGELOG - wishlist, develop another (non-alt text) example. make any examples link in the main document, rather than incorporated directly. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action10]
<shawn-MEL> ACTION: CHANGELOG - 'weak image' add browser etc labels to to other boxes [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action11]
<shawn-MEL> ACTION: CHANGELOG - put all 'weak' images in one slide, titled "when any component is weak" with a subpoint "impact: less accessible web" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action12]
<shawn-MEL> ACTION: CHANGELOG leave guidelines listing slide for display as a wrap-up reminder [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action13]
<shawn-MEL> ACTION: CHANGELOG - add WAI logo to w3c logo in header [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action14]
<shawn-MEL> ACTION: CHANGELOG - last slide FMI -add link to WAI homepage [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action15]
<shawn-MEL> LUNCHTIME!
BACK!
<shawn-MEL> overview page: http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/components-slides
shawn: plus other slides
issues
... also glossary - EO draft and ATAG + WCAG additions
Andrew: requirements - audience = general overview of what the BC resource suite contains. An in-company presentation would be too specific for WAI to cover
Wayne: could act as a frameowrk for the organisation version to build on
Reqs - purpose: a) accessibility aware audience - refresh people's mind about the different benefits & present a framework for arguing for accessibility
Reqs - purpose: b) as part of a class - to broaden the beneficiaries that people think about (internal & external)
Note: encourage people to fill in their own stats (within an org or within a country)
<scribe> ACTION: CHANGELOG ALL WAI SLIDESETS (with handout notes) - encourage presenters to print and provide as a handout PLUS provide the reference at start and finish [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action16]
Discussion: decided to aproach slides with a twin focus of social (right thing to do) plus organisation's bottom-line
<Wayne> Note: In general, present short lists of key examples, rather than exhaustive lists of all possibilities. For example, in beneficiares, perhaps concentrate on PDAs, cell phones and restricted environments. Then hand out the complet list of beneficiaries.
shawn: suggest the idea of not restricting our selves to he format or structure of the BC document
andrew: maybe start broarder and
then progressively tie it back to the BC document
... many factors that we actually list have many benefits -
across the four areas
<hbj> Discussion: The wish list is to broaden the scope in teh bginning and inrodution of the business case.
discussion: pragmatically, we
need a generic version that could be customised for any
organisation - easier to follow the BC doc structure for
V1
... this version becomes an intro to the business case doc - we
should keep the grander plan for later
Shawn: include in the handouts
the fact that bthe BC doc is a "cafeteria plan" including
questions to guide your choice of factors to include
... http://www.w3.org/WAI/bcase/Overview.html#custom
+ questions
Approach: use Andrew's OZeWAI slides as the starting point
Andrew: possible title - Benefits of Web Accessibility: Developing a Business Case
Shawn: ... for your Organisation
Note: an intro slide needed to be developed
we just had a fire-drill evacuations - hence the absence of response
Wayne: suggested social factors pts: a) Essential for equity and diversity, b) Benefits people with and without disability, c) A part of corporate responsibility
Group: V1 of the slides is just the basic outline (with some editorial for readability as slides) with speakers notes that basically link to the appropraite part of the BC doc and may have a few suggestions for additional slides
<scribe> ACTION: wayne & andrew to prepare a mockup with exact headings (with suggested rewordings in brackets) plus customising slide (cafeteria plan) plus additional presenters instructions (such as adding local stats) at the start [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html#action17]
s/at the start/at the start [slidy - http://www.w3.org/Talks/Tools/Slidy/]
See: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/glossary/glossary-2005-12-12
discussion:
bar/drinking/pub/trivia games for wai groups - "this term [] is
in which WAI glossary?"
... added atag and wcag terms to glossary table - see version
online
Discusison: Tuesday - consider term definitions in light of differences
Meeting closed: 1840
rssagent, draft minutes
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.127 of Date: 2005/08/16 15:12:03 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/CHANGELOG: document & slides - change "developers" label to "content developers" & dcesribption to authors, designers, coders// Succeeded: s/axamples/examples/ Succeeded: s/ exaustive lists of all possbilities/ exhaustive lists of all possibilities/ Succeeded: s/handounts/handouts/ Succeeded: s/customising slide/customising slide (cafeteria plan)/ WARNING: Bad s/// command: s/at the start/at the start [slidy - http://www.w3.org/Talks/Tools/Slidy/] No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Andrew Inferring Scribes: Andrew Present: Andrew Helle Shawn Wayne WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2005/12/11-EO-minutes.html People with action items: - -add add all andrew browser change changelog components encourage essential etc examples fmi guidelines handout image interdependent labels last link logo notes presenters slh slide slides slidesets wai wayne weak with WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]