See also: IRC log
Mark: Wiki server is up again, may be unstable for a couple of weeks until new hardware arrives
-> Record of 2005-08-02 meeting
ACTION: Ben create a way to track progress on the 3 issues of qnames, reification, and custom attributes and elements [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action01] [DONE]
-> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2005-current-issues RDF in XHTML Taskforce - Current Issues
ACTION: Ben to notify working group via a status report of upcoming WD of Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/19-swbp-minutes.html#action02] [DONE]
-> [HTML] RDF-in-HTML Task Force Update to the SWBPD WG [Ben 2005-08-08]
ACTION: Ben add role attribute to the [HTML] issues list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-swbp-minutes.html#action08] [DONE]
-> Role issue
ACTION: Ben send mail to www-html-editors to assign an issue for the GRDDL namespace document behind the profile [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/19-swbp-minutes.html#action03] [DONE]
-> Request to Track Issue: GRDDL in XHTML2 namespace document [Ben 2005-08-07]
ACTION: Ben to put together the "ACID" test for XHTML2 RDF/A [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action02] [CONTINUES]
-> RDF/A Wiki
Ralph: meet next week?
Mark: regrets for next 2 weeks
... also regrets from Steven for next week
Ralph: I'm not available on 6 Sep
... I will poke JJC and DanBri to see if either of them want to meet before 6
Sep, else next meeting 6 Sep
-> RDF in XHTML Taskforce - Current Issues
Mark: in a new document I'm writing, I've been using the custom attribute shorthand rather extensively. I am looking also at reification and it seems that a good way to do this might be to allow META to specify an RDF Statement, then easy to talk about this Statement. In early drafts of RDF/A META was like SPAN but now we're relying more on A+attributes so META can become more powerful
-> suggestion new uri scheme??? for bnodes [Jeremy 2005-08-11]
Ralph: I've started to think about this and wonder if a namespace would be an adequate solution? A similar question came up in naming variables for RDF rules languages and this must arise in SPARQL too
Mark: problem still with getting down to URIs
in triples
... my final conclusion was that we either need 2 attributes or an XPointer
function
... I think I've pretty much demonstrated that the other methods won't
work
... need others to come up with arguments for or against these
ACTION: All take a serious look at Mark's [3]bnode proposal summary [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action07] [CONTINUES]
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2005Jun/0010.html
ACTION: JJC to review rdf concepts and fragments [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action10] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Mark to check edge cases of inheritance in RDF/A [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-swbp-minutes.html#action06] [CONTINUES]
Change Log
$Log: 16-swbp-minutes.html,v $ Revision 1.3 2005/08/16 15:00:31 swick First published draft